Ethereum's core developers have recently been reflecting on a question—what exactly is wrong with the internet today? It is filled with data extraction and psychological manipulation of users, and this "corporate garbage" model has become mainstream. There are voices beginning to advocate for an alternative path: shifting towards a "sovereign network."



What does this path look like? Simply put, it is privacy-first, data localization, and users controlling their own information. Coupled with sustainable financial tools, rather than reckless high-leverage speculation. Why do this? To protect user independence and give everyone genuine psychological autonomy.

From an application perspective, this means we need to redesign products and services that interact with users. No longer optimized solely for maximum data extraction, but built around user interests and privacy protection. Financial tools should also be adjusted—adopting a stable and sustainable model, rather than encouraging users to bet wildly on leverage.

It's easier said than done. But more and more voices are emerging, perhaps indicating a direction for the Web3 ecosystem—using technological means to rebuild people's trust in the internet.
ETH-0,88%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SmartContractWorkervip
· 01-11 00:28
It sounds ideal, but frankly, isn't it just another hype? Can money really change people?
View OriginalReply0
PerennialLeekvip
· 01-10 22:52
Starting to talk about sovereign networks again, but the question is, who is actually using them?
View OriginalReply0
CryingOldWalletvip
· 01-10 22:51
Once again, that set of idealistic rhetoric sounds good but the reality is harsh. --- Sovereign networks? Sounds good, but the key is how many people actually care about privacy. --- Honestly, do big companies voluntarily give up data? Dream on. --- Sustainable finance sounds good, but who can resist the temptation of leveraged returns? --- I agree, it all depends on whether Web3 can really get this done without ending in failure. --- Here we go again, I heard this last year, and we're still debating it. --- Prioritizing privacy is difficult; humans are naturally easily defeated by convenience. --- Technological trust reconstruction? First, improve your own ecosystem governance. --- The core issue is whether users are willing to pay the price for privacy. I think it's uncertain. --- This kind of discussion is interesting, but implementation is the hard part.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofEnthusiastvip
· 01-10 22:50
Sounds ideal, but in reality... will the big companies willingly decentralize?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryervip
· 01-10 22:46
In plain terms, the ideal is very full of hope, but reality is quite harsh.
View OriginalReply0
NFTBlackHolevip
· 01-10 22:41
It sounds good, but I just want to ask—are users really on board with truly privacy-first products? Or do they still have to be "cutting leeks" to survive?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt