An interesting discussion has emerged—about common misconceptions regarding the growth of crypto communities. Some suggest that frequent interactions and spamming can actually decrease daily exposure rather than increase influence. This logic is quite eye-opening: overposting ultimately leads to self-destruction, and truly valuable announcements are drowned out in the noise. This touches on the core contradiction in CT operations—an overly hasty posting rhythm often backfires. A point worth pondering for community operators and project teams is where the balance between quality and pace truly lies.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityHunter
· 01-12 07:35
This is a typical signal drowning phenomenon... The higher the frequency, the lower the exposure actually is. It's somewhat similar to the slippage issue caused by liquidity dispersion in DEXs, where everyone is competing for that fixed attention pool.
View OriginalReply0
BlockTalk
· 01-11 05:27
Haha, you're so right. The people spamming don't realize they're just consuming the algorithm.
That's why some small projects posting ten tweets at once are less effective than big accounts getting a single post with many likes.
Actually, sometimes silence is more powerful than noise.
Really, I muted my own account as soon as I started spamming.
Quality, in the crypto world, is always a scarce resource.
This gap in understanding is huge; most operations are still stuck in the trap.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 01-10 20:56
Honestly, this hits the pain points of many projects... The ones constantly flooding the screens are ignored, it's interesting.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller
· 01-10 20:47
To be honest, I've fallen into this trap... Posting every day actually lowers my ranking in the algorithm, it's really ridiculous.
View OriginalReply0
StrawberryIce
· 01-10 20:42
Damn, this is what I want to hear. Watching those project teams flood the screens every day until I'm sick of it.
View OriginalReply0
Deconstructionist
· 01-10 20:38
Amazing, isn't it? It's just like those project teams' suicidal operations we see every day—posting over ten updates a day, but no one pays attention.
View OriginalReply0
ThatsNotARugPull
· 01-10 20:36
That's right. Our project manager keeps flooding the screen every day, but as a result, the followers actually decreased. Truly incredible.
An interesting discussion has emerged—about common misconceptions regarding the growth of crypto communities. Some suggest that frequent interactions and spamming can actually decrease daily exposure rather than increase influence. This logic is quite eye-opening: overposting ultimately leads to self-destruction, and truly valuable announcements are drowned out in the noise. This touches on the core contradiction in CT operations—an overly hasty posting rhythm often backfires. A point worth pondering for community operators and project teams is where the balance between quality and pace truly lies.