Some major foundation investments in the crypto space raise eyebrows when the advisory roles involved don't pan out as expected. History shows that when certain ecosystem funds back consultants for market development—particularly in launch strategy roles—the outcomes can be mixed. The pattern sometimes repeats: the initial project ships, tokens distribute, and then the advisor pivots to other ventures. Whether this reflects misaligned incentives or simply the nature of early-stage crypto advising, it's worth watching how these capital allocation decisions impact larger ecosystem health.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasGuru
· 19h ago
ngl, this tactic is so cliché, the advisor takes the money and runs, and the project team still has to carry the burden...
View OriginalReply0
PrivateKeyParanoia
· 01-11 22:32
ngl I've seen this trick many times before, advisors taking the money and running... really need to reflect on who is working for whom.
View OriginalReply0
WalletManager
· 01-11 20:55
Fund advisors eat and run, I've seen this trick too many times. To put it simply, it's just misaligned incentive mechanisms. On-chain data never lies.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiVeteran
· 01-10 20:52
It's the same old trick again—advisors take the money and run, leaving the ecosystem to foot the bill.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekNewSickle
· 01-10 20:52
Huh, isn't this the typical "cutting leeks" scheme of crypto consultants? Take the consulting fee and run away.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiGreenie
· 01-10 20:45
It's the same old trick again—consultants take the money and run, while the project team is still clueless.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSourGrape
· 01-10 20:37
If only those funds had been able to see through people's hearts back then, they wouldn't have been so thoroughly cut by these advisors now...
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 01-10 20:26
It's the same old trick again—advisors take the money and run, leaving the project team dumbfounded.
Some major foundation investments in the crypto space raise eyebrows when the advisory roles involved don't pan out as expected. History shows that when certain ecosystem funds back consultants for market development—particularly in launch strategy roles—the outcomes can be mixed. The pattern sometimes repeats: the initial project ships, tokens distribute, and then the advisor pivots to other ventures. Whether this reflects misaligned incentives or simply the nature of early-stage crypto advising, it's worth watching how these capital allocation decisions impact larger ecosystem health.