2026-01-10 20:24:46

Many people see Walrus and immediately think of IPFS, Filecoin, and similar solutions, but this is a common misconception.

To put it simply, those traditional storage solutions only answer one question: where is the data stored? But Walrus's fundamental goal is not just that. Its ambition is to turn data into something that can be directly operated on-chain, with a completely different starting point.

The key difference lies in the integration method. Walrus is deeply integrated with the Sui ecosystem. What does this mean? It means data is no longer an isolated external resource. Contracts can directly reference and verify it, with zero additional adaptation costs. For developers, this feels as natural as breathing.

The tokenomics also reflect this difference. Walrus's $WAL demand comes from real data access behaviors, not from market hype artificially driving up demand. This model is healthier and more sustainable.

Looking at application scenarios—dynamic NFTs, real-time games, on-chain content protocols—these all require high data timeliness and operability. In these areas, Walrus’s low node entry barrier and ecosystem default integration advantages shine. It naturally fits these scenarios rather than forcing adaptations.

So don’t think of it as just a "cheaper storage option." Walrus’s true value lies in elevating data to a core on-chain asset, transforming data from a passive storage object into an active contract participant. This is where its competitive edge truly lies.

WAL1,07%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ApeWithAPlan

· 01-10 20:51

Oh, finally someone clarified it—Walrus is definitely not just an upgraded storage solution. Wait, regarding the actual demand model for WAL, isn't it still susceptible to price manipulation? Deeply tying to Sui, that risk is quite significant... if the ecosystem encounters issues, the data will suffer too. That's true, but I'm more concerned about when real applications will actually be implemented. No matter how loud the hype, it doesn't matter. The idea of directly operating data through smart contracts is indeed brilliant; it all depends on whether developers buy into it.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamer

· 01-10 20:50

Well, it seems that Walrus is indeed not just simple storage. To be honest, the Sui ecosystem's deep integration this time is quite impressive. Directly manipulating data through smart contracts? It sounds like a great developer experience, without so many intermediate steps. WAL's token model is driven by real demand, which feels much more reliable than projects that are purely hype. Dynamic NFTs and blockchain games require this kind of plug-and-play data layer, and Walrus is naturally well-suited for it.

View OriginalReply0

MagicBean

· 01-10 20:50

Oh wow, someone finally explained it clearly. Walrus is definitely not a cheap product. The move to deeply integrate with Sui is indeed powerful; developer experience directly skyrockets. The demand for WAL comes from real behavior, not from hype stories to pump the price, I believe that. As for dynamic NFTs, I’m curious to see how they will develop in the future.

View OriginalReply0

DecentralizedElder

· 01-10 20:48

Alright, finally someone has explained this thoroughly. I was indeed confused by the IPFS approach before. WAL is not storage; it's about turning data into living entities on the chain, which makes a huge difference. Deeply binding Sui is a status symbol; developers no longer need to mess around with all those complicated adaptation layers. Tokens are driven by real demand, making them a hundred times healthier than projects that rely on stories.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 01-10 20:34

To be honest, someone finally explained this clearly: Walrus is indeed not just a "cheap cloud storage."

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 01-10 20:32

Finally, someone has explained it clearly: not all storage is called storage. Walrus's move is indeed fierce, directly turning data into on-chain natives. Does this mean Sui is about to take off? Deeply binding the ecosystem... will it crash later? $WAL relies on real demand to support it; this still has some imagination.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinSkeptic

· 01-10 20:28

Oh, now I understand. Walrus is not here to sell cheap storage at all. --- Deep integration with the Sui ecosystem is indeed impressive; zero adaptation cost is very friendly to developers. --- $WAL relies on real demand rather than hype? Is that even achievable? I'm a bit skeptical. --- Wait, can dynamic NFTs and real-time gaming really take off? The data timeliness might become a bottleneck. --- Turning data into on-chain assets is a good idea, a step above the IPFS approach in terms of dimension. --- The key is whether the Sui ecosystem itself is strong enough; if the ecosystem is weak, everything else is pointless. --- Directly manipulating data through smart contracts? How is security guaranteed? This part wasn't mentioned. --- Sounds good, but will the actual cost of usage also increase? The tokenomics still need to be observed. --- Hmm, looking at it this way, Walrus has indeed found its own differentiation, not just copying the Filecoin model.

View OriginalReply0