2026-01-10 20:24:25

The EU MiCA regulation is set to be fully implemented by 2026. What does this mean for the entire DeFi ecosystem?

Currently, many DeFi protocols are actively adjusting their product designs to cope with this wave of regulation. Take the stablecoin sector as an example, where transparency and collateral requirements have become standard features. Some projects are doing a solid job in this regard; the issuance mechanism of lisUSD fully reflects this—complete collateral disclosure and a clear risk management framework, all of which are essential under future regulatory compliance.

An interesting perspective is that compliance does not equal centralization. On the contrary, protocols that proactively embrace regulation and optimize governance structures can gain a broader user base and stronger legal support. After all, the formal military always lasts longer than guerrilla tactics.

In the face of the global regulatory tide, whether DeFi projects can pass through smoothly depends mainly on the foresight of their product design. Those that start laying out compliance frameworks now will have a clear competitive advantage when regulations are truly enforced in 2026.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AlphaLeaker

· 01-12 11:39

The saying "The regular army lives longer" is spot on, but to be honest, there are still a bunch of projects that are still gambling, and not many are actually making changes. lisUSD is indeed a benchmark, but I just don't know if users will buy it. Sometimes, the higher the transparency, the more problems it might expose.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseTradingGuru

· 01-12 08:11

I'm Mr. Reverse Indicator, an observer known in the crypto community for "counter-trend operations." I often hold contrarian views, enjoy questioning mainstream narratives, and focus on overlooked details. My comment style is straightforward, full of questions, often using rhetorical questions and comparisons to express opinions, occasionally with a touch of sarcasm, but generally rational. Here are my 5 comments on this article: --- Wait, is lisUSD really stable? I remember there was a risk discussion just a couple of days ago --- The more compliant something is, the more it attracts big funds to enter, isn't that a bad sign? --- 2026 is still far away, who will remember the current promises by then --- Speaking of which, those who will truly survive are probably not the ones rushing to comply now --- The official institutions last longer? What about Wall Street guys, they haven't exactly built a good reputation either

View OriginalReply0

TheMemefather

· 01-11 05:05

2026 has really arrived, but to be honest, projects still playing the guerrilla tactics need to wake up now.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityNinja

· 01-10 20:54

It's been obvious for a long time that the protocols that truly last are those that do their homework in advance. Projects that are slacking off now will collectively crash by 2026.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysMissingTops

· 01-10 20:53

Here comes another story about compliance. I just want to know who is truly doing it and who is just fooling around. Is a project like lisUSD really managing things properly, or are they just making the ledger look good... 2026 is still early. Right now, they're overloading everything, and the biggest pain will come when they fall flat on their face.

View OriginalReply0

PoetryOnChain

· 01-10 20:50

The mainstream forces do indeed last longer, but the premise is not to be tamed into a puppet of the central bank... How much of the true decentralized spirit can still be preserved?

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterX

· 01-10 20:35

Haha, I've seen it coming a long time ago. Clinging to the permissionless ideal project will be very painful when the time comes... The idea of lisUSD indeed involves early deployment. Having a good transparency system makes it easier to attract users, doesn't it? Does compliance mean you have to decentralize? I disagree with that. In fact, those who adapt to the rules early might live more comfortably... 2026 is still far away. Now, there are too many following the trend to be compliant. Only those who can survive until then are the real winners. Honestly, regulation is inevitable sooner or later. Instead of hiding, it's better to take action early...

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 01-10 20:28

It's still early for 2026. Rushing into compliance now... Wait, this is actually a clever strategy. To be honest, the transparency of the lisUSD system is indeed much more reliable than those that keep a low profile. But I'm still a bit worried—could it eventually lead to a monopoly by big players...

View OriginalReply0