2026-01-10 19:25:47

Here's what we need to understand:

Whenever established interests face disruption, pushback is inevitable.

Yet structural market reforms don't destroy value—they unlock it.

Breaking down monopolistic gatekeeping mechanisms, restoring genuine competition, and dismantling artificial barriers creates space for fresh opportunities. More jobs. Broader markets. Accelerated innovation across the ecosystem. That's the real outcome when competitive forces are genuinely unleashed.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ContractSurrender

· 5h ago

Basically, it's about breaking the monopoly. It sounds great, but once implemented, there are a bunch of unexpected issues.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 01-10 19:55

ngl I've heard this rhetoric too many times. How many reforms can truly break the monopoly? Most are just rebranding and continuing to exploit...

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 01-10 19:52

According to on-chain data tracking, the underlying logic of this statement is quite obvious—those who have a vested interest often provide the biggest clues for solving the case. The so-called "human obstacles" can almost always be traced back to who is maintaining them through multi-address association analysis. When market monopolies are broken, capital flows never deceive; they reveal where genuine innovative capital is flowing.

View OriginalReply0

liquidation_surfer

· 01-10 19:52

Well said, breaking the monopoly is the only way to truly unleash value. The old forces can shout all they want, but they can't change the trend.

View OriginalReply0

ImaginaryWhale

· 01-10 19:51

Well said, breaking monopolies requires someone to stand up. Really, this theory is most applicable in the crypto world. Many large platforms rely on their monopolistic position to charge arbitrarily, and now that competitors appear, they start crying and calling for help. Breaking the deadlock is the only way to create new opportunities, and there is no doubt about that. Oh my god, finally someone has explained this thoroughly. In my opinion, the more competitive the market, the better. The step of anti-monopoly should have been taken long ago. Hmm... it sounds ideal, but how about in practice? Can those vested interests obediently relinquish their power?

View OriginalReply0