2026-01-10 19:23:33

About time someone called this out. You see it everywhere in crypto—plenty of big-name accounts acting like they've got it all figured out. Here's the thing though: getting in early and actually being smart are totally different animals. One's timing, the other's judgment. And let's be real, maybe 1% genuinely know what they're talking about. The rest? Just riding the wave and acting omniscient.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidityWitch

· 01-10 19:53

Someone should have exposed this earlier. 99% of people are just bluffing with luck.

View OriginalReply0

LightningSentry

· 01-10 19:53

I've been wanting to complain about this for a while. Those big influencers who act like experts are actually just lucky to have hit the right timing.

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster

· 01-10 19:52

ngl, the claim of 1% is too optimistic. I think at most 0.5%... The big players just happened to bet correctly a few times.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeJumper

· 01-10 19:51

I've been wanting to complain about this for a while. The big influencers in the crypto world are really outrageous, and if they're lucky, they think they're geniuses.

View OriginalReply0

DaoDeveloper

· 01-10 19:51

ngl the 1% stat feels generous tbh... i've audited enough smart contracts from "influencers" to know most are just pattern-matching on past cycles. timing != alpha, yet everyone acts like it does

Reply0

OnchainDetective

· 01-10 19:37

Is that all? Someone should have exposed this facade long ago. I'm already fed up with those so-called influencers pretending to be gurus. Entering the market doesn't mean you're clear-headed; frankly, they're just a bunch of gamblers.

View OriginalReply0