That's the question gaining traction as AAVE token has tanked roughly 25% amid internal governance friction. The trigger? Frontend fee revenue—previously flowing to the DAO treasury—got rerouted to Aave Labs instead. Simple move, massive implications. It's sparked a broader reckoning: who actually owns the protocol's frontend infrastructure, the intellectual property rights, and controls the economic mechanisms underneath? These aren't just technical nitpicks. They cut straight to the heart of decentralized governance. When a protocol's economics shift without unanimous community backing, trust erodes fast. The Aave community is watching closely to see whether this sets a precedent for how core decisions get made going forward.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkLibertarian
· 4h ago
Coming back with this again? Aave Labs really doesn't hold back when it comes to playing; the fees disappear in the blink of an eye, and the DAO has become just a decoration.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinConnoisseur
· 4h ago
Another show of "decentralization," with fees redirected to Aave Labs, leaving the community stunned... Now let's see who the real parent is.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 01-10 18:59
Here we go again with this? Front-end fees just go straight into the Labs' pocket, is this called decentralization? Laughing to death
View OriginalReply0
ZenZKPlayer
· 01-10 18:54
It's the same old story again. The DAO treasury funds are transferred to Labs just like that. What do you call this decentralization?
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 01-10 18:52
Doing the same thing again? Aave Labs is shifting fees into their own pockets and acting as if it's justified. Truly laughable.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 01-10 18:38
AAVE's recent move directly exposed the skin of decentralized governance, it feels like the team is calling the shots.
View OriginalReply0
NestedFox
· 01-10 18:30
It's the same story again. Moving fees to Aave Labs directly cuts 25%. Laughable. It's just the old centralized trick.
Who really calls the shots at Aave?
That's the question gaining traction as AAVE token has tanked roughly 25% amid internal governance friction. The trigger? Frontend fee revenue—previously flowing to the DAO treasury—got rerouted to Aave Labs instead. Simple move, massive implications. It's sparked a broader reckoning: who actually owns the protocol's frontend infrastructure, the intellectual property rights, and controls the economic mechanisms underneath? These aren't just technical nitpicks. They cut straight to the heart of decentralized governance. When a protocol's economics shift without unanimous community backing, trust erodes fast. The Aave community is watching closely to see whether this sets a precedent for how core decisions get made going forward.