In community discussions, I heard an interesting comparison: instead of following projects without real backing, it's better to find a project that directly redistributes tax revenue to holders. What's the difference? Just look at the numbers.

It's the same investment, putting 30,000 into a project's K-line, versus using 300,000 to create a fund-based K-line configuration with a completely different yield structure. The former relies on single-point breakthroughs, while the latter depends on systematic yield accumulation. The project team recently entered the market, which also validates the feasibility of this logic—those who truly believe will also follow. Time will tell everything.