Ever notice how much crypto content on X feels rushed and low-effort? That's exactly what we're pushing back against.
Blixt Editor exists to change that game. The idea is simple: kill the generic slop, create stunning visuals in minutes, and ship professional-grade images and videos without the headache.
We believe Web3 deserves better content standards. That's the whole point.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SatoshiSherpa
· 12h ago
Honestly, this set of words sounds a bit much, but Blixt's approach really hits the pain points.
---
Alright, finally someone can't stand those five-minute quick-fix trash contents.
---
The quality of Web3 content definitely needs to be improved, but it still depends on execution.
---
Damn, another editing tool? How many of these will still be around after half a year?
---
I love the phrase "kill generic slop," but unfortunately most people don't care at all.
---
Wait, can it really produce professional-level content in just a few minutes? If that's true, I might consider trying it.
---
It's another case of raising standards and claiming to be professional-grade. The words sound good, but it just feels like selling dreams.
---
Is this thing faster than Figma? Can it match the results?
---
I just want to know why it has to target the crypto community. Aren't general content tools good enough?
View OriginalReply0
FastLeaver
· 12h ago
Really, most of the crypto content I see on X is garbage; I agree with this idea.
The generated content has some substance, but can it be sustained?
The quality of content definitely needs to improve; it's always the same old stuff.
It's another new tool; as long as it works, that's fine. The key is quality.
If this set of tools can truly solve problems, that would be great.
View OriginalReply0
PrivateKeyParanoia
· 01-13 03:24
What else is there to compete for? The quality of content really needs to step up.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeaker
· 01-10 22:24
Someone finally said it, really tired of those spammy articles.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainArchaeologist
· 01-10 16:53
Someone finally said it, crypto Twitter is indeed a mess.
Well said, the quality definitely needs to be improved.
This logic is good, the content is getting more intense.
Web3 content is indeed everywhere, I praise this idea.
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemist
· 01-10 16:50
Someone should have said this earlier; there's way too much trash content flooding X.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofGremlin
· 01-10 16:29
Damn, finally someone is talking about this. The crypto content on X is really terrible.
To be honest, the idea behind Blixt is good, but can it really change the current situation?
It's just another tool; ultimately, it depends on how people use it.
The quality of Web3 content needs to be upgraded, but tools can't save lazy people either.
I have to try this. If it can really produce a blockbuster in a few minutes, I’ll be convinced.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 01-10 16:28
Good grief, someone finally said it. This trash content is like random gunfire on the battlefield, completely missing the target.
Ever notice how much crypto content on X feels rushed and low-effort? That's exactly what we're pushing back against.
Blixt Editor exists to change that game. The idea is simple: kill the generic slop, create stunning visuals in minutes, and ship professional-grade images and videos without the headache.
We believe Web3 deserves better content standards. That's the whole point.