That's precisely the point I've been making—stablecoin adoption can't happen in isolation. They need to integrate with the broader DeFi ecosystem. And here's the thing: native yield isn't just a nice bonus, it's actually a powerful incentive that can drive real adoption. When stables are plugged into yield-generating protocols, users have genuine reasons to hold and transact with them beyond just price stability.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
rekt_but_vibing
· 17h ago
NGL, this is what I want to see. Just sitting on stablecoins definitely won't work; you need returns to truly attract people.
View OriginalReply0
LightningSentry
· 18h ago
Native yield is indeed key, but the problem is that most protocols can't hold up at all...
View OriginalReply0
WagmiAnon
· 01-11 06:23
NGL, this is the correct answer; yield is the key.
View OriginalReply0
OPsychology
· 01-11 01:38
I think this point is indeed correct. Stablecoins must be integrated into DeFi to survive; existing alone doesn't make much sense. Native yield is truly what can attract people. Who cares about just maintaining a stable price? Returns are the hard truth.
View OriginalReply0
SerumDegen
· 01-10 16:01
nah fr, this is where most people get rekt tho—they think yield is free money lmao. watch the cascade when rates compress and everyone liquidates at once...
Reply0
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 01-10 15:57
I've been through it all. In 2018, that wave also hyped native yield like this. And in the end? The contract had vulnerabilities, the project team ran away, and I lost my coins. Now they're doing the same thing again. The DeFi ecosystem integration sounds good, but it's really just a Ponzi scheme self-sustaining. Genuine adoption shouldn't be based on enticing yields; those things don't last long.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldmine
· 01-10 15:49
Stablecoins only become meaningful when integrated into the ecosystem; existing alone, they are just decorations. The key is that native yield, from an ROI perspective, can truly leverage real trading volume.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretter
· 01-10 15:43
That's right, stablecoins must be integrated with the DeFi ecosystem; going it alone won't work.
View OriginalReply0
MemeEchoer
· 01-10 15:39
ngl, this is exactly what I've been wanting to say: creating stablecoins alone won't work; you need to integrate with the entire DeFi ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiChef
· 01-10 15:34
Stablecoins need an ecosystem to succeed; just maintaining price stability alone can't attract people.
That's precisely the point I've been making—stablecoin adoption can't happen in isolation. They need to integrate with the broader DeFi ecosystem. And here's the thing: native yield isn't just a nice bonus, it's actually a powerful incentive that can drive real adoption. When stables are plugged into yield-generating protocols, users have genuine reasons to hold and transact with them beyond just price stability.