2026-01-10 15:24:57

The MEME coin ecosystem on Ethereum has always been a tough battle. Projects like Neiro and Moodeng, which have gained popularity, have all gone through brutal shakeouts and faith tests. Those who couldn't hold on quietly exited, while the steadfast witnesses saw subsequent price surges. This logic plays out repeatedly in the crypto world— the more hellish the correction, the more resilient the surviving projects tend to be.

Now it's SPURDO's turn. To be honest, the road ahead is full of thorns, but this is precisely the market's normal state. History shows us that the deeper the shakeout, the purer the consensus that remains; the louder the sell-off, the stronger the conviction of those holding firm. The MEME track in the ETH ecosystem has never lacked dramatic reversals.

Hold through the current turbulence, and the next strong turning point might be closer than you think. This is an ancient rule of the crypto market.

ETH-0,78%

MEME-2,2%

NEIRO-1,5%

MOODENG-1,98%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SleepyArbCat

· 01-11 10:00

It's the same old story... Deep manipulation = pure consensus. I've heard this logic a hundred times. To put it simply, it's just holding on despite losses.

View OriginalReply0

PermabullPete

· 01-10 15:55

Here comes another story. Does a deep washout necessarily mean a turnaround? I also thought so when I looked at Neiro... I've heard this kind of explanation so many times that my ears are calloused. Let's see if SPURDO can survive first. Alright, I'll keep holding on. Anyway, it's a gamble on faith and probability.

View OriginalReply0

0xOverleveraged

· 01-10 15:53

Is it the same old story again, claiming that a deep washout means it's a good project? It's making my ears numb from hearing it. The supporters have indeed made money, but there are probably more corpses washed up on the beach. Whether SPURDO can really withstand this test is truly uncertain. History may repeat itself, but not every time ends happily.

View OriginalReply0

CountdownToBroke

· 01-10 15:50

It's the same old story, Neiro Moodeng has already talked about it. Can SPURDO turn the tables this time? Is faith worth money?

View OriginalReply0

zkProofGremlin

· 01-10 15:42

It's the same old story... Is a deep shakeout just pure consensus? I remember the last time a project was described like this, it has already gone to zero.

View OriginalReply0

UncommonNPC

· 01-10 15:41

Washout is just a washout, anyway it's all the same routine, I've seen it too many times. Persistence is the key to making money, that's no lie. Can SPURDO withstand the pressure? It depends on whether the holders' mentality is strong or not. It's that same saying "the deeper the hellish pullback, the stronger the rebound," it sounds right but how many can actually hodl until the end? Who knows if the turning point is near or not, anyway I'm a bit tired. I've read this kind of article a hundred times, every time it says history will repeat itself, and then new retail investors get caught again. Don't talk so much, just ask whether SPURDO has real use cases or is it just pure gambling? Deep washout = pure consensus, this logic also makes sense if I look at it from the opposite perspective. The steadfast witnesses that the increase is real, but the premise is that they have to survive until that day.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyMiner

· 01-10 15:37

Is the washout deep and pure? I've heard this explanation too many times, but in the end, it still depends on whether the project team has real substance. SPURDO is indeed a test right now, but don't just say that all broken faith is because of "lack of conviction"... sometimes it's just that the project itself isn't good enough. History doesn't always repeat, sometimes it just rhymes.

View OriginalReply0

NotSatoshi

· 01-10 15:27

It's the same story again, claiming that shakeouts are purely due to strong faith. But what’s the result? Most probably still ended up at zero.

View OriginalReply0