In an era where 5 new coins are launched every second, why did Dusk choose to be "slow"?
The crypto world is now a speed game—no one wants to read whitepapers, and projects that have no news for two months are heavily criticized for being "slow." But RWA (Real-World Assets) is different; it involves legal rights confirmation, asset backing, and cross-border settlements. Any compliance loophole in this area can cause a project to fail outright. In this race, "fast" actually means courting disaster.
Dusk has persisted since 2018, watching those energetic public chains rise and fall, but it has never changed its approach. It maintains a steady pace, refines ZK circuits, negotiates with regulatory authorities, and continuously tests the limits of Piecrust. This kind of "slow" may indeed seem like a loss in the early bull market, with no apparent progress.
But this is the power of compound interest—trust takes time to build. When those RWA projects rushed to catch the trend and collapsed due to compliance issues, Dusk’s well-crafted infrastructure over the years is what can truly support the ecosystem moving forward. That’s why some projects are destined to be fleeting, while others can become foundational infrastructure.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleWatcher
· 01-11 09:37
This is the true way to understand RWA, unlike those short-sighted project teams, which ultimately end up with nothing but a mess.
View OriginalReply0
MEVEye
· 01-10 14:59
Haste makes waste, but the crypto world just doesn't give you the chance to take it slow.
View OriginalReply0
PrivacyMaximalist
· 01-10 14:56
Slow and steady wins the race. In the RWA track, speed isn't everything; a single compliance loophole can wipe you out entirely.
View OriginalReply0
NFTHoarder
· 01-10 14:55
Slow work yields fine results; rushing the RWA path is not feasible. Watching those projects that only produce news every two months, they will eventually explode due to compliance issues. Dusk, which has persisted since 2018, is honestly quite impressive.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOrektGuy
· 01-10 14:53
Wait, Dusk has been around for so many years? Why do I feel like I just got to know it... It makes me a bit scared. Where did all those quickly rising projects go now?
In an era where 5 new coins are launched every second, why did Dusk choose to be "slow"?
The crypto world is now a speed game—no one wants to read whitepapers, and projects that have no news for two months are heavily criticized for being "slow." But RWA (Real-World Assets) is different; it involves legal rights confirmation, asset backing, and cross-border settlements. Any compliance loophole in this area can cause a project to fail outright. In this race, "fast" actually means courting disaster.
Dusk has persisted since 2018, watching those energetic public chains rise and fall, but it has never changed its approach. It maintains a steady pace, refines ZK circuits, negotiates with regulatory authorities, and continuously tests the limits of Piecrust. This kind of "slow" may indeed seem like a loss in the early bull market, with no apparent progress.
But this is the power of compound interest—trust takes time to build. When those RWA projects rushed to catch the trend and collapsed due to compliance issues, Dusk’s well-crafted infrastructure over the years is what can truly support the ecosystem moving forward. That’s why some projects are destined to be fleeting, while others can become foundational infrastructure.