On January 9th, the U.S. President prematurely posted the non-farm employment data on social media—almost a day before the official release. According to the data, since January, the U.S. private sector has added 654,000 jobs, while government employment has decreased by 181,000.



The official later claimed this was an "unintentional leak" and stated that they would review the data release process and embargo agreements. The President himself denied any responsibility. Interestingly, the market reaction was surprisingly calm—U.S. stock index futures only fluctuated slightly, with no major abnormal movements.

However, the underlying issues exposed by this incident are worth paying attention to. As economic data forms the basis for market decisions, who gains an early advantage from the leak? Where is the fairness? Will market participants' trust in official data be undermined as a result?

This is a question the crypto industry has been contemplating. When centralized information dissemination mechanisms repeatedly have vulnerabilities, the demand for "trustless" systems and verifiable data becomes more practical. What can blockchain technology offer? Transparency, immutable records, and the possibility for all participants to access information simultaneously. This is not some lofty technological ideal, but a practical response to the flaws of existing systems.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 16h ago
Haha, playing the "accidental" game again? This kind of problem should have appeared long ago. --- The real horror is when the market doesn't react... it means institutions have known about it for a long time. --- Decentralized data publishing is indeed imaginative in Web3. --- Basically, it's insider trading, just a different way of saying it. --- Wait, isn't this the reason why we need on-chain data? --- The officials always say "accidental," and they'll come back next time. --- Trust is eroded time and again... no wonder everyone is optimistic about blockchain. --- Whoever gets the data first makes money; this game rule is inherently rotten. --- Transparency... centralized systems can never provide it. --- U.S. stock futures are calm, which is even more suspicious. Some people have probably already priced it in.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-26d7f434vip
· 01-12 17:09
Haha, this is what centralized systems are like—data leaks and then blaming it on "accidents," hilarious... Web3 should have been popularized a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
StrawberryIcevip
· 01-11 22:54
Wow, this is called "accidental"? If the data had been released a day earlier, who would believe it? Someone must be hiding behind the scenes pocketing the profits.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosophervip
· 01-11 02:35
Laughing out loud, it's "unintentional disclosure" again. I've heard this excuse too many times. Centralization is the root of the problem; crucial data can only be trusted when it's on-chain.
View OriginalReply0
BlockDetectivevip
· 01-10 14:54
It's all just tricks. Official data is nothing special, no wonder everyone is rushing to the chain.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 01-10 14:50
Haha, coming up with this again? Centralized information dissemination has so many vulnerabilities that it's dying to be decentralized.
View OriginalReply0
SorryRugPulledvip
· 01-10 14:46
Here comes another "accidental leak"... Who would believe it? It's just insider trading with a different name. I've long said that centralized systems will inevitably encounter problems, and now even the officials are contradicting themselves. The transparency of blockchain makes this look especially ironic. The lack of major market fluctuations is even more bizarre; it feels like someone has known all along. This is why we insist on decentralization; we can't rely on the system.
View OriginalReply0
GasWastervip
· 01-10 14:37
lol so they leaked nfp data and acted like "oops my bad" 😂 meanwhile crypto's been screaming about this exact problem for years... centralized data = insider trading playground, no cap
Reply0
WenAirdropvip
· 01-10 14:33
Here we go again, this is a joke in traditional finance... Everyone knows that the leaked data was long since eaten up by internal spies, and now you're saying it was "unintentional"?
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)