2026-01-10 14:25:22

For Ethereum developers, the biggest headache when switching to a new public chain is having to relearn tools and adapt to a new environment. But now this problem can be solved. DuskEVM is fully compatible with the entire Ethereum development toolchain. The tools you're used to, like MetaMask, Hardhat, Truffle, can be used directly without any migration cost. The real difference is—your contracts run on a blockchain that comes with privacy protection and is friendly to compliance. This is very attractive for DeFi applications and RWA applications, allowing you to enjoy the freedom of blockchain while addressing compliance risks. For development teams, spending less time on tool tinkering and more time on business innovation makes this trade-off very worthwhile.

ETH6,05%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasOptimizer

· 01-13 03:33

Zero migration cost sounds great, but can privacy + compliance really get off the ground? It depends on what on-chain data says.

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketman

· 01-11 14:48

Zero migration cost? Isn't this just DuskEVM providing a launch window for ETH developers to jump on board? They can directly use existing tools, eliminating the friction of re-debugging, making it highly efficient. A compliant and privacy-friendly blockchain—when calculating the coefficient of this angle, it indeed has strong appeal for the RWA track. The question is whether the ecosystem can keep up with the fuel supply. Tool compatibility is just superficial; the key is whether TPS and fees can break through the atmosphere. Otherwise, no matter how convenient, it's all in vain. This wave of true escape velocity tests whether the developer ecosystem can rapidly gather. Right now, it's still in the low Earth orbit testing phase.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityJanitor

· 01-10 14:49

Wow, isn't this exactly what I've been wanting? Finally, someone has solved the migration cost issue.

View OriginalReply0

SellTheBounce

· 01-10 14:35

Zero migration cost sounds great, but in the end, these projects are always used by the bagholders. Sell on rebound, don't be fooled by compatibility.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSupportGroup

· 01-10 14:33

Zero migration cost sounds pretty great, but can privacy and compliance really be achieved at the same time? It's a bit uncertain.

View OriginalReply0

FlyingLeek

· 01-10 14:31

Zero migration cost sounds good, but can privacy and compliance really coexist? There might be pitfalls here.

View OriginalReply0

QuorumVoter

· 01-10 14:26

Zero migration cost truly hits the pain point; previously, switching chains required half a day of re-adaptation.