Recently, I came across an interesting technological integration direction—deep collaboration between a storage protocol and mainstream network infrastructure. It is understood that this solution relies on a global network of 280,000 nodes, making significant breakthroughs in data transmission latency control, reducing transmission time to under 50 milliseconds. From a funding perspective, the $140 million raised provides ample support for ecosystem development. Notably, the launch of its deflationary mechanism is worth paying attention to, as this design logic is still relatively rare in the Web3 storage sector. In the long term, projects that provide infrastructure-level solutions like this may become key players in the Web3 storage field.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroJunkie
· 8h ago
50 milliseconds sounds impressive, but I don't know how it actually performs in practice. The test environment and the mainnet are often worlds apart.
View OriginalReply0
GasBandit
· 01-11 08:58
Fifty milliseconds sounds comfortable, but the 280,000 nodes only count if they are really running.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiChallenger
· 01-10 14:54
50 milliseconds sounds impressive, but has anyone checked the actual operational rate of 280,000 nodes?
---
1.4 billion USD in funding plus a deflationary mechanism—I've seen this combination back in 2017. Do you know what happened afterward?
---
Infrastructure-level solutions sound great, but Filecoin has said the same thing.
---
Interestingly, every time they claim this time is different, the market irrationality follows with a round of hype.
---
Data shows that a 50ms delay reduces performance—what about stability in real-world scenarios? Or is it only impressive during the demo phase?
---
Ironically, the more grandiose the project narrative, the more I want to see its actual capacity. No exception this time.
View OriginalReply0
SneakyFlashloan
· 01-10 14:52
50 milliseconds? Sounds good, but how many of these can actually be implemented in practice? Usually, these numbers look impressive.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 01-10 14:51
From a technical perspective, the 50 milliseconds figure needs to be carefully examined. Is it P95 or average latency? 280,000 nodes sound impressive, but the level of decentralization determines everything; otherwise, it's just empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 01-10 14:51
280,000 nodes sound pretty impressive, but that 50 milliseconds part definitely has some substance.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_watcher
· 01-10 14:50
Within 50 milliseconds? Sure, I wasn't joking this time, but can the deflation mechanism really work?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWizard
· 01-10 14:25
50 milliseconds? That's really fast data transfer speed, but the deflationary mechanism is the real highlight. Finally, there's a project daring to do this.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiGreenie
· 01-10 14:24
Is this data of 50 milliseconds a bit unreliable? Can it really stay stable when used?
Recently, I came across an interesting technological integration direction—deep collaboration between a storage protocol and mainstream network infrastructure. It is understood that this solution relies on a global network of 280,000 nodes, making significant breakthroughs in data transmission latency control, reducing transmission time to under 50 milliseconds. From a funding perspective, the $140 million raised provides ample support for ecosystem development. Notably, the launch of its deflationary mechanism is worth paying attention to, as this design logic is still relatively rare in the Web3 storage sector. In the long term, projects that provide infrastructure-level solutions like this may become key players in the Web3 storage field.