It's striking how some of the most active community contributors end up flying under the radar on reputation systems. Take the example of someone who's been consistently educating their followers, hosting regular community sessions, and putting in real effort to help people level up their knowledge. Yet their review count tells a completely different story. This gap between actual impact and recognized contribution raises questions about how Web3 platforms measure and surface meaningful participation. When dedicated community members aren't getting the visibility their work deserves, does that reflect the platform's rating mechanism or our collective oversight in acknowledging those efforts?