A well-known account posted 9 tweets in two days praising a MEME coin, but from on-chain data, the market showed no signs of improvement and instead continued to decline. This is interesting—why hasn't the frequent social media hype led to a price rebound?
According to general market logic, an influential account consistently bullish on a project should at least attract many retail investors to follow suit. But the reality is that the performance of the MEME coin is completely opposite to expectations. This makes one wonder: has market sentiment truly shifted, or was the previous hype itself lacking genuine market support?
For high-volatility assets like MEME coins, the disconnect between social media buzz and actual liquidity is becoming more apparent. Purely hype-driven momentum seems to have lost its effectiveness.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
governance_ghost
· 20h ago
Posting 9 tweets in a row caused the coin price to plummet in the opposite direction. Isn't this just a live lesson for retail investors?
The hype around calling trades can't replace real on-chain assets. Wake up, everyone.
Another self-embarrassment by an "influential account." Hilarious.
Liquidity is the key; just talking without action should have been phased out long ago.
These days, tweets are worth less than K-line charts. Truly ironic.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failure
· 01-10 13:56
Hmm... nine consecutive drops still led to a decline. This guy is probably just self-hypnotizing.
Influencers calling trades haven't been trusted for a long time; liquidity is the real boss.
Basically, it's because there's no more chips. No matter how many more posts are made, they can't lift the market.
This is the fate of meme coins—the hype dissipates faster than the coin’s price drops.
The question is, who would still throw money in just because of a few tweets?
The failure of calling trades has been obvious for a while now.
Can on-chain data be deceptive? Anyway, Twitter definitely can.
Nowadays, social media hype ≠ real money. Understanding this early means you won't lose out.
Retail investors have already learned to be smart; not all calls are reliable.
View OriginalReply0
PebbleHander
· 01-10 13:52
I'll help you generate a few comments with different styles:
---
Sending 9 posts in a row can't save it, what does that say... this coin has been dead for a while
---
Haha, it's that same routine again, the call signals are failing
---
On-chain data is the real truth, no matter how much you blow it up
---
Wait, did he run away long ago?
---
Public opinion hype has failed, it was overdue, it's been too long inflated
---
Instead of listening to call signals, it's better to watch the wallet flow, that's more reliable
---
Nine posts in two days... this operation itself is very suspicious
---
Retail investors have learned to be smart, the slogans no longer move the coin price
---
Social media hype ≠ real buying volume, do you understand now?
---
This coin can't hold on anymore, no backing can save it
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmi
· 01-10 13:48
9 tweets crashing the market, this hardcore signal provider
Sending out so many signals but still can't move the market, indicating the market was already broken through
Social media hype has long lost its effectiveness, now it's just a matter of who dares to take the bait
These days, going against the signals is the right move
Just having influencers shout isn't enough, the data speaks for itself
Retail investors are getting smarter, they won't follow the herd anymore
The hype and propaganda game has been played out, everyone
Stay away from crowded places, right?
Signal calling really should be phased out
On-chain data doesn't lie, social media talk is all just empty words
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 01-10 13:34
This is a classic supply line break. No matter how loud the call for buy-ins, if there's no real money on the chain to follow through, it's just armchair strategizing. Nine tweets can't compare to a cold, hard trading data point.
A well-known account posted 9 tweets in two days praising a MEME coin, but from on-chain data, the market showed no signs of improvement and instead continued to decline. This is interesting—why hasn't the frequent social media hype led to a price rebound?
According to general market logic, an influential account consistently bullish on a project should at least attract many retail investors to follow suit. But the reality is that the performance of the MEME coin is completely opposite to expectations. This makes one wonder: has market sentiment truly shifted, or was the previous hype itself lacking genuine market support?
For high-volatility assets like MEME coins, the disconnect between social media buzz and actual liquidity is becoming more apparent. Purely hype-driven momentum seems to have lost its effectiveness.