A high-profile incident occurred on Thursday evening. U.S. President Trump posted on his social media platform the key U.S. non-farm employment data that had not yet been officially released, nearly a day ahead of the official release time. The chart shows that since January this year, the U.S. private sector has added 654,000 jobs, while government employment has decreased by 181,000 jobs. These data were originally scheduled to be released by the U.S. Department of Labor along with the December non-farm employment report on Friday.
The White House later responded that this was an "unintentional act" and stated that they would review the procedures for releasing economic data and embargo agreements. Officials explained that the President is legally entitled to receive some economic data in advance, some of which come from legitimate early briefings, but should not be made public during the embargo period. Trump himself said it was not his responsibility, jokingly stating, "Let them publish it if they want."
Interestingly, this is not the first time that an incident has been triggered by early hints or disclosures of non-farm data. Market performance shows that after the event, U.S. stock index futures only fluctuated slightly during light trading hours, with no obvious anomalies so far.
However, analysts have issued warnings. KPMG Chief Economist Diane Swonk pointed out that leaking such sensitive data early could undermine market fairness and prompt investors to make hasty decisions before the official announcement. For the market, such incidents could weaken investors' trust in the neutrality and credibility of U.S. official economic data — which could be a big problem for any data-driven trading strategies.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DefiPlaybook
· 20h ago
According to the data, the embargo agreement is essentially useless... 654,000 private sector jobs versus a reduction of 181,000 government jobs. This comparison itself is an information gap. Once market trust is broken, the trading logic based on on-chain data will completely collapse.
View OriginalReply0
ShortingEnthusiast
· 01-12 06:21
Here we go again, the embargo agreement is just a display? This guy can influence the global market with a single tweet, and we're still waiting for official data here.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizedElder
· 01-10 13:58
Haha, this operation really treats the embargo agreement as a decoration
New tricks of information asymmetry to cut leeks? Retail investors are about to be harvested again
Sending during the embargo period, hilarious, this logic is truly a masterstroke
Data-driven strategies now have to be renamed "politically driven"
Now the market fairness has completely collapsed, no wonder everyone is moving to on-chain trading
Thinking of that previous operation, this guy really can't sit still
Embargo? Not applicable to me, hilarious
Official credit score drops by -1, no wonder institutions are migrating to the chain
So knowing non-farm payroll data a day in advance can make you earn passively? This scheme is too dirty
They have already issued it, and we are still here taking it slow, this differential treatment is truly exceptional
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingersFrontrun
· 01-10 13:58
Laughing out loud, it's "unintentional" again, and this excuse is even more frequent than BTC's fluctuations.
View OriginalReply0
StopLossMaster
· 01-10 13:52
Another one? The embargo agreement is just a paper tiger...
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbie
· 01-10 13:52
Another one? The embargo agreement is just a decoration.
View OriginalReply0
NFTragedy
· 01-10 13:49
Here it comes again, releasing data randomly during the embargo period. This routine is so familiar.
---
Laughing to death, claiming it was "unintentional"? Will they say it was a slip of the hand next time too?
---
If I had known that data-driven strategies are unreliable, I would still rely on news sentiment for flexible responses.
---
Market fairness has already become a joke. They can release information whenever they want.
---
This operation is truly breaking the game rules. No wonder some people are on alert.
---
It's not the first time; it feels like this has become a regular occurrence.
---
Legal briefings are okay, but public disclosures are not? That logic is a bit bizarre.
View OriginalReply0
not_your_keys
· 01-10 13:48
Haha, this move is really clever. Spoiling the data in advance is like spoiling the plot early—some people make money, others lose.
It's "unintentional" again, that excuse is almost rotten... Do they really think the market is that naive?
They embargo first and then release right after, truly breaking the rules.
Such things would have been blasted in the crypto community long ago—double standards at their best.
Doing this around non-farm payrolls, how can anyone still expect market fairness?
People who know the data in advance get rich, others just take the hit—classic套路.
That's why I still believe in on-chain transparency. CeFi and TradFi are just different sets of rules.
The shady vibe is pretty strong... No wonder it's the US.
If this keeps up, no one will trust official data anymore, and the derivatives market will tremble.
Claiming it’s "unintentional," I don’t believe you, brother.
The US stock market is so manipulative—just leaking some data can wipe out the retail investors.
A high-profile incident occurred on Thursday evening. U.S. President Trump posted on his social media platform the key U.S. non-farm employment data that had not yet been officially released, nearly a day ahead of the official release time. The chart shows that since January this year, the U.S. private sector has added 654,000 jobs, while government employment has decreased by 181,000 jobs. These data were originally scheduled to be released by the U.S. Department of Labor along with the December non-farm employment report on Friday.
The White House later responded that this was an "unintentional act" and stated that they would review the procedures for releasing economic data and embargo agreements. Officials explained that the President is legally entitled to receive some economic data in advance, some of which come from legitimate early briefings, but should not be made public during the embargo period. Trump himself said it was not his responsibility, jokingly stating, "Let them publish it if they want."
Interestingly, this is not the first time that an incident has been triggered by early hints or disclosures of non-farm data. Market performance shows that after the event, U.S. stock index futures only fluctuated slightly during light trading hours, with no obvious anomalies so far.
However, analysts have issued warnings. KPMG Chief Economist Diane Swonk pointed out that leaking such sensitive data early could undermine market fairness and prompt investors to make hasty decisions before the official announcement. For the market, such incidents could weaken investors' trust in the neutrality and credibility of U.S. official economic data — which could be a big problem for any data-driven trading strategies.