2026-01-10 13:25:45

In the wave of the crypto market, systematic trading and risk management are often the dividing line between beginners and professional traders. As a technical specialist focused on quantitative strategy development, I have been contemplating how to better utilize technical methods to respond to market volatility.

Our team has independently developed an automated trading system based on a multi-factor risk control model. After a period of research and internal validation, we are now collaborating technically and conducting data backtests with several traders with practical experience. This is not a fundraising project or a promise of returns—simply put, it’s about refining the system’s logic through real-world cases and feedback.

The essence of the collaboration is technical exchange. What can we offer? Strategy demonstrations based on historical data, comprehensive backtest reports, and in-depth discussions on how to optimize the system’s efficiency through systematic methods. What can’t we offer? Financial advice, guaranteed returns, or investment management services.

If you are interested in this kind of thing, the prerequisite is to fully understand the high-risk nature of digital asset trading and genuinely want to optimize trading processes from a technical perspective. We will conduct qualification reviews to ensure both parties are on the same wavelength—focused on managing risk more scientifically, rather than chasing overnight riches.

We welcome colleagues interested in systematic trading and risk control to exchange ideas.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ColdWalletAnxiety

· 12h ago

This guy is not wrong; the true winners are those who understand risk control. --- The backtesting report sounds pretty good, but the qualification review part is a bit strict... Can I casually look at the data? --- It's multi-factor risk control again. Is this really different this time? --- I believe you when you say you don't promise returns, but what about actual operation? How is the data made public? --- Finally, someone has spoken frankly. It's not about cutting leeks. --- Systematic trading has been talked about so many times; the key is still discipline in execution. --- Qualification review? How to review—technical skills or account size? --- I just want to ask if it has been verified with real trading; backtesting is always just backtesting. --- No matter how good the risk control is, a black swan can still ruin everything. Don't mythologize it. --- Not bad, at least being honest about your limitations.

View OriginalReply0

TokenToaster

· 01-10 13:55

This multi-factor risk control system sounds good, but the key is whether the backtest data can convince people. --- I'm a bit interested, but is the qualification review process really serious? --- Finally, someone is talking about risk control instead of just talking about returns, thumbs up. --- I've heard about automated trading systems many times, but actually running them is a different story. --- I just want to ask, can this system withstand a bear market? The backtests all look good. --- Wow, first of all, be clear about what you can't provide. I like this attitude. --- What specific factors are in the multi-factor model? Can you share some details? --- Qualification review? Haha, how to do it, how to prove you're genuinely looking to optimize rather than just trying to catch a quick profit. --- It's nice to call it technical exchange, but most likely, you're just looking for someone to run alongside to improve the strategy. --- How to discuss the cooperation details? Are there any guarantee mechanisms?

View OriginalReply0

TooScaredToSell

· 01-10 13:54

Alright, finally someone is seriously discussing risk control instead of just shouting about returns. I really value your qualification review step, as it can filter out a bunch of rookies. Honestly, multi-factor models sound reliable, but a good backtest doesn't necessarily mean good performance in real trading. You should be well aware of this. I'm interested in understanding how your risk model is specifically set up. This low-key collaboration approach is much more reliable than those who shout "stable returns" every day. Feels like I've found an organization haha. --- I dare not move, just want to see if there's a more scientific way to manage my coins. --- Qualification review? How do I know if I am "on the same frequency" as you? --- Wait, has your system been tested through extreme market conditions? Like the 312 event? --- Multi-factor risk control is definitely the right direction, just worried that in the end, a black swan might still knock us down and grind us into the ground.

View OriginalReply0

ServantOfSatoshi

· 01-10 13:54

This approach is indeed correct, but the qualification review part is really necessary to filter out those who want to get rich overnight. Alright, having backtest data is the most convincing; just talking nicely is meaningless. Is multi-factor risk control serious? Then it's worth discussing. These days, those who dare to openly say "cannot guarantee returns" are actually more trustworthy. Backtest results look good, but real trading is the true test. I'm a bit interested, but how can we judge if the system is stable?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropSweaterFan

· 01-10 13:44

This is the proper quantitative approach, much more reliable than projects that boast about returns. --- I believe in the qualification review step; it's necessary to weed out those trying to get rich quick. --- Multi-factor models sound good, just curious about how the actual backtest data looks. --- Honestly, teams that are willing to clearly state what they cannot provide are already halfway to success. --- From the perspective of technical cooperation, being clear-headed about risk control means traders can stay much more stable. --- This honest way of expression is rare; most are just flashy packaging.

View OriginalReply0