Indonesia's move to restrict Grok has stirred up the debate around tech censorship vs. legitimate regulation. The government cited concerns about AI-generated explicit content—but here's the thing: generative models like ChatGPT and Gemini can produce similar outputs when prompted, yet they operate freely in the region. So what's really going on?

This raises a critical question: are we looking at consistent policy-making, or selective enforcement? Every technology can be weaponized. The issue isn't whether misuse exists—it absolutely does—but whether regulatory responses are applied uniformly across the board. When one AI platform faces restrictions while others don't, despite comparable risks, it starts to look less like thoughtful governance and more like picking sides. The inconsistency itself becomes the story.