Honestly, the upward surge of this asset would have already skyrocketed in the A-shares market. But why is the recognition of it in the Chinese community not high? Whether it's related Chinese tokens or cultural-themed cryptocurrencies, they all can represent certain ecological value. The market's attitude is quite interesting — even though the fundamentals are not bad, a consensus has not been formed. What exactly is behind this difference?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoCross-TalkClub
· 01-12 15:27
Laughing to death, this is what you call the collective silence of the retail investors. Having good fundamentals doesn't matter; the project team needs to tell a compelling story.
Speaking of which, the Chinese community is so indifferent that probably the last project with "ecological value" has already gone to zero.
Things that can soar in the A-share market become cold in the crypto world. I really can't understand this logic.
Wait, are you trying to say that Chinese coins seem promising but no one is actually buying them? That's indeed absurd.
If you ask me, maybe everyone is just too scared of getting burned. Even the best stories need to be trusted at half price.
View OriginalReply0
ETHReserveBank
· 01-12 14:46
Tsk, this is the common flaw of domestic retail investors—always looking down on their own stuff.
View OriginalReply0
notSatoshi1971
· 01-12 03:48
In plain terms, the Chinese community is severely fragmented and each doing their own thing.
Retail investors don't trust the cultural coin at all; they only look at technical aspects and the movements of big players.
This is ridiculous; even when the fundamentals are good, no one wants it.
Really, the low acceptance of the domestic ecosystem is a common problem, not just this one.
I think we have to wait for influential figures to set the tone before retail investors will follow.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 01-10 13:51
Uh, isn't this just information asymmetry? The retail investors in A-shares and the people in the crypto circle are simply not on the same wavelength.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 01-10 13:51
Broke the level, brother. The Chinese community is just like this.
View OriginalReply0
PumpingCroissant
· 01-10 13:39
That's right, it's a matter of information asymmetry. People in the Chinese community still trust old-school coins like Bitcoin and Ethereum more.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofEnthusiast
· 01-10 13:32
To be honest, the Chinese community is like this; even the best things depend on what the influencers say. It's not a fundamental issue, purely a consensus game.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerMiner
· 01-10 13:25
Hi, to be honest, the Chinese community tends to cluster together and lacks independent judgment.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictim
· 01-10 13:25
Your Chinese community really doesn't give face. If this market trend had happened in the A-shares, it would have already been a huge celebration.
Honestly, the upward surge of this asset would have already skyrocketed in the A-shares market. But why is the recognition of it in the Chinese community not high? Whether it's related Chinese tokens or cultural-themed cryptocurrencies, they all can represent certain ecological value. The market's attitude is quite interesting — even though the fundamentals are not bad, a consensus has not been formed. What exactly is behind this difference?