After exploring projects in the privacy track, I always feel they are either one or the other—either data is tossed around in a black box, with developers doing whatever they want; or everything is openly transparent, with no privacy at all. It wasn't until I delved into Dusk's design logic that I truly understood what system-level thinking really means.



This project isn't just a simple "privacy coin" concept; it has built an entire architectural technical framework. The core zero-knowledge proof circuit design is like installing a one-way transparency system at every link of the entire system. From an external perspective, all interactions fully comply with regulatory standards and norms; but internally, the specific business logic and data flow are completely opaque. In today's highly regulated environment, this "compliant stealth" approach is indeed innovative.

What impresses me even more is its consensus layer design. While other projects in the market are frantically stacking TPS numbers, Dusk treats "deterministic finality" as the infrastructure foundation. Simply put: once a transaction is on the chain, it becomes an irreversible fact. Even if the network splits, it can automatically recover and reach global consensus. This is like seismic reinforcement in building structures—unobtrusive in normal times but lifesaving under extreme pressure. If heavy assets are to circulate on-chain, the value of this certainty far exceeds mere speed.

The smart contract aspect is even more interesting. Dusk provides developers with a set of privacy programming primitives, allowing you to define data visibility and access permissions directly at the contract level. Privacy is no longer a binary choice of "full privacy or full transparency," but can be finely programmed into functional modules. Imagine a future scenario: a fully automated privacy auction or on-chain private fundraising, where the entire process is executed automatically by code, yet the transaction details remain tightly sealed.

With on-chain data now so transparent that privacy is almost nonexistent, do serious business activities dare to fully disclose contracts and prices? Dusk's approach to achieving privacy within a compliant framework might be the key that large institutions are truly looking for.
DUSK7,02%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ZkProofPuddingvip
· 01-10 21:31
It does sound a bit different, but the idea of compliant stealth is a bit too idealized, isn't it?
View OriginalReply0
MercilessHalalvip
· 01-10 12:56
Sounds good, but can it really be implemented? --- Zero-knowledge proofs have been discussed for so many years, why haven't they exploded... --- The compliance and stealth approach sounds a bit like what regulators prefer, but do institutions really dare to use it? --- Final certainty confirmation sounds much more reliable than just stacking TPS numbers --- Privacy programming primitives... another cool-sounding concept, but developers need to actually be able to use it --- Private fundraising on the chain also requires privacy? That's the real demand --- Ultimately, it's still the old problem: how to balance privacy and regulation. Dusk is just another trade-off --- This approach is indeed different from other projects, but what about the ecosystem? Without user adoption, it's all pointless --- The earthquake-resistant reinforcement analogy is pretty good, but it can't change the fundamental fragility of the chain
View OriginalReply0
staking_grampsvip
· 01-10 12:43
Hmm, this set of logic actually has some substance. It's not just about stacking privacy but making breakthroughs in compliance aspects.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)