You'll see a wave of new builders emerging from operations and chief of staff roles. Why? Because they're positioned at the intersection where the real friction lives. They watch firsthand as scaling teams hit bottlenecks, spot the manual workflows nobody bothers to systematize, catch the gaps in coordination that slow everything down. That ground-level visibility into what's broken? It's the exact playbook you need to identify market opportunities and build solutions people actually need. The ops mind gets trained to see inefficiency as a feature, not a bug—and in crypto, that translates into spotting the next generation of problems worth solving.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WalletDivorcer
· 01-10 12:57
People with an ops background can indeed see clearly where the bottlenecks are... This wave of builders coming from operations/chief of staff might really come up with something.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzler
· 01-10 12:52
People with an ops background are indeed more likely to identify pain points, but truly successful builders still need to have a gambler's spirit.
View OriginalReply0
DefiVeteran
· 01-10 12:49
Builders with an ops background do have advantages, but to be honest, most still become process optimization tools, and very few can truly see through the pain points and turn them into products.
View OriginalReply0
gaslight_gasfeez
· 01-10 12:43
Builders with an ops background do have a natural advantage, but now who isn't claiming to see the "next-generation problem"?
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_ngmi
· 01-10 12:40
Builders with an ops background do tend to identify real pain points, but how many of those can actually be turned into products?
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyLemur
· 01-10 12:35
Builders with an ops background do have a natural advantage, but only a few can truly create something.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizard
· 01-10 12:34
nah tbh the ops-to-founder pipeline is statistically significant but like... empirically speaking most of these folks just end up rebuilding the same coordination layers nobody wanted in the first place. seen it happen too many times already lol
You'll see a wave of new builders emerging from operations and chief of staff roles. Why? Because they're positioned at the intersection where the real friction lives. They watch firsthand as scaling teams hit bottlenecks, spot the manual workflows nobody bothers to systematize, catch the gaps in coordination that slow everything down. That ground-level visibility into what's broken? It's the exact playbook you need to identify market opportunities and build solutions people actually need. The ops mind gets trained to see inefficiency as a feature, not a bug—and in crypto, that translates into spotting the next generation of problems worth solving.