Market Changes Under the New Export Tax Refund Policy for Lithium Batteries
Recently, I looked at customs data. By 2025, the total export value of lithium batteries is expected to be around 550 billion yuan. Based on an average price of 0.6-0.7 yuan/Wh, the actual export volume is approximately 800-900 GWh. Among these, pure battery exports (including energy storage and power battery packs) account for about 300 GWh, and this segment is more sensitive to price fluctuations.
From the perspective of domestic electricity prices, the returns on integrated wind, solar, and storage projects are actually quite good. Overseas electricity prices are so high that energy storage demand remains extremely strong, similar to the second half of last year. Therefore, from the energy storage side alone, the impact of export tax refunds may not be as significant as imagined.
The key issue is the power batteries. The export of complete new energy vehicle (NEV) units, which includes battery packs, is also included in the calculation, and vehicle exports cannot avoid taxes. However, in practice, removing tax refunds on batteries does not significantly impact the end prices of vehicles. In the long run, prices may only slightly increase, without shaking the market demand for NEVs.
Price transmission to end customers is likely to proceed smoothly, unlike the endless price competition seen in the photovoltaic industry. The rush to install in 2026 will boost lithium mineral demand, but by 2027, demand will shrink, and upstream mineral supply will also be constrained. This situation could actually benefit existing lithium mining capacities.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HappyMinerUncle
· 14h ago
Energy storage is really stable. With such high overseas electricity prices, who wouldn't stockpile electricity?
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekMaster
· 17h ago
The energy storage part is indeed okay, but the transmission of power battery prices to consumers... We'll have to see how sales go later. Don't use the same tricks in photovoltaics anymore.
View OriginalReply0
TeaTimeTrader
· 01-10 12:56
Energy storage has indeed been affected by overseas electricity prices, but the real test is the transmission pressure of power batteries.
If price increases can't be passed on, it's game over, and then we'll have to compete fiercely again.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanboy42
· 01-10 12:54
The energy storage sector isn't as bad as I thought, overseas electricity prices are indeed outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoFortuneTeller
· 01-10 12:54
Storage can still hold up, but the key is how the entire vehicle passes the cost... I've never thought the price transmission would go this smoothly.
View OriginalReply0
SeasonedInvestor
· 01-10 12:50
Energy storage still has potential, as overseas electricity prices are ridiculously high... but when it comes to power batteries, it really depends on how automakers absorb the costs. Price transmission sounds good in theory, but in practice, it's a whole different story.
View OriginalReply0
pvt_key_collector
· 01-10 12:27
The energy storage sector is indeed resilient under pressure, as overseas electricity prices are there for everyone to see, and everyone has to buy. The ripple effect of the recent surge in power batteries won't be too painful, and it's much more considerate than photovoltaics.
Market Changes Under the New Export Tax Refund Policy for Lithium Batteries
Recently, I looked at customs data. By 2025, the total export value of lithium batteries is expected to be around 550 billion yuan. Based on an average price of 0.6-0.7 yuan/Wh, the actual export volume is approximately 800-900 GWh. Among these, pure battery exports (including energy storage and power battery packs) account for about 300 GWh, and this segment is more sensitive to price fluctuations.
From the perspective of domestic electricity prices, the returns on integrated wind, solar, and storage projects are actually quite good. Overseas electricity prices are so high that energy storage demand remains extremely strong, similar to the second half of last year. Therefore, from the energy storage side alone, the impact of export tax refunds may not be as significant as imagined.
The key issue is the power batteries. The export of complete new energy vehicle (NEV) units, which includes battery packs, is also included in the calculation, and vehicle exports cannot avoid taxes. However, in practice, removing tax refunds on batteries does not significantly impact the end prices of vehicles. In the long run, prices may only slightly increase, without shaking the market demand for NEVs.
Price transmission to end customers is likely to proceed smoothly, unlike the endless price competition seen in the photovoltaic industry. The rush to install in 2026 will boost lithium mineral demand, but by 2027, demand will shrink, and upstream mineral supply will also be constrained. This situation could actually benefit existing lithium mining capacities.