2026-01-10 12:23:13

The global liquidity tap shows no signs of slowing down. Take a look at what's happening across major economies right now.

China's rolling out QE measures. Japan's doing the same. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve is actively purchasing T-bills, and Trump has signaled his own quantitative easing plans. It's basically coordinated monetary expansion on a global scale.

Here's the interesting part from the last cycle: global liquidity typically peaks roughly 2-3 months after Bitcoin reaches its top. If we're treating $126K as the peak, then the subsequent wave of global liquidity shouldn't necessarily create a new ATH right away.

The timing dynamics matter here. When you've got multiple central banks simultaneously pumping liquidity into the system, the impact on risk assets like Bitcoin doesn't necessarily follow a straight line. Historical patterns suggest the relationship is more nuanced than that.

BTC0,36%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SerumDegen

· 7h ago

ngl the 2-3 month lag theory is cope... we've seen the liquidity cascade flip on its head before. central banks don't move in lockstep like this article implies, there's always friction. $126k wasn't the top anyway imo.

Reply0

GasFeeLady

· 01-10 18:32

ngl this 2-3 month lag theory hits different when you think about it from a gwei perspective... like we're all watching the liquidity pump but the actual execution window is what matters, not the announcement. timing is everything fr

Reply0

GasFeeVictim

· 01-10 12:52

The global liquidity injection this time is really intense, with China, Japan, and the US all releasing funds simultaneously. The pace is a bit outrageous. Will the peak of Bitcoin's value be delayed by 2-3 months to reach the liquidity peak? Then we’ll have to wait and see. Is historical experience reliable... It feels like this time is a different story altogether.

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHustler

· 01-10 12:52

This wave of global liquidity injection feels endless... China, Japan, and the US are all easing simultaneously, the pace is indeed a bit crazy. After 126K, we still have to wait 2-3 months for liquidity to peak? I feel like it's already a bit behind. Multiple central banks pumping money at the same time, but Bitcoin doesn't necessarily follow the rise; this logic just sounds uncomfortable.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWallflower

· 01-10 12:37

With the global liquidity injection so aggressive, why does it still feel like the coins are locked up...

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeWhisperer

· 01-10 12:31

With such aggressive global liquidity injection, is 126k really the top... It seems the future depends on how the central banks will continue to respond.

View OriginalReply0

TradFiRefugee

· 01-10 12:28

With the global liquidity injection so aggressive, do you still believe 126k is the top? Historical patterns suggest that the peak of liquidity lagged by 2-3 months, so this wave is just beginning.

View OriginalReply0

SingleForYears

· 01-10 12:24

The global liquidity injection... really just like opening the floodgates and never stopping Bitcoin 126K, after topping out, still need to wait 2-3 months? That’s way too slow, who can wait? The central banks’ coordinated liquidity injections, feels like the same old tricks 126K isn’t the real top, there’s still more to come This logic is a bit all over the place, can historical patterns really be reused? With such aggressive liquidity injection, cryptocurrencies should have already soared... but what’s the result? Wait a minute, so now is the best window for bottom fishing?

View OriginalReply0