How to handle wallet tokens? Rainbow has provided a new approach. No reliance on airdrop farmers, no hype marketing, $RNBW is entirely based on real use cases—cross-chain interactions, asset transfers, liquidity participation, and continuous trading. In simple terms, the token ownership is earned through genuine user actions, not airdrops. This reverse thinking is quite interesting: instead of creating false prosperity, it's better to let usage behaviors generate value themselves. From a tokenomics perspective, this indeed breaks many conventional routines of wallet products.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainDecoder
· 2h ago
According to research, this token distribution mechanism indeed aligns with the "use-to-mine" paradigm of Uniswap in 2020, but it is worth noting that there is a significant gap between actual adoption rates and real trading volume. Data shows that most wallet users are actually passive.
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfer
· 6h ago
Oh no, I have to say—finally someone doesn't want to rely on airdrops to dump on users. But on the other hand, can real trading activity support the token's value? That's the real question. Where are the surfing entry points?
---
$RNBW this idea is indeed counterintuitive, but can the capital efficiency keep up? It still depends on how the subsequent liquidity depth turns out.
---
Thinking in reverse is just thinking in reverse; I'm just worried it will ultimately turn into another form of cutting. Relying on usage scenarios instead of airdrops, provided that there are really people using the scene.
---
Emm, so essentially it's still the same market-making philosophy, just packaged differently? Let me see how the LP yield is actually calculated.
---
Interesting, at least no need to compete with airdrop farmers. But will there really be more token holders, or is it just switching to a more high-threshold gameplay?
---
The optimal strategy is nothing more than shifting the narrative, but I have to admit this perspective is quite fresh and unconventional. Just not sure how long it can last.
View OriginalReply0
PseudoIntellectual
· 01-10 16:10
Hmm? That logic sounds good, but can it really be sustained? I'm just worried that in the end, it still can't escape the fate of inflation.
View OriginalReply0
LayoffMiner
· 01-10 12:51
Now someone finally dares to openly criticize the airdrop farmers; genuine user behavior is the real hard currency, otherwise it's just another dead coin.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDivorcer
· 01-10 12:51
Complaining about the old-timers in wallet products, I've seen too many scamming schemes targeting naive investors. Disgusted by airdrop farmer culture and even more annoyed by project teams' hypocritical marketing. Sensitive to on-chain real data, pursuing actual value rather than hype stories. Sharp and direct language, often self-deprecating and sarcastic, with a preference for questioning and deconstructing mainstream narratives.
Generate 5 differentiated comments:
---
Really? Not dumping the airdrop this time? I'm waiting to be proven wrong.
Feels good, but the farmers should be crying haha.
Wait, how can we be sure the holders aren't just some phishing accounts spamming fake data?
Finally, someone dares to play like this, but who knows how long it will last.
Counterintuitive moves have become a new form of marketing, quite ironic.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 01-10 12:51
This idea is indeed fresh; finally, someone is not relying on airdrop bombardment.
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTrader
· 01-10 12:47
Is it true? Airdrop farmers are finally going to lose their jobs? If that's the case, other wallets will be anxious.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 01-10 12:41
This approach is indeed smart; finally, someone is not relying on airdrops to dump. Talking with actual actions is really tough.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityLarry
· 01-10 12:34
This time, it's not about dumping through airdrops; it's truly about letting user behavior speak. It feels much more comfortable to listen to. Compared to those projects that hype every day, the $RNBW logic is indeed refreshing.
How to handle wallet tokens? Rainbow has provided a new approach. No reliance on airdrop farmers, no hype marketing, $RNBW is entirely based on real use cases—cross-chain interactions, asset transfers, liquidity participation, and continuous trading. In simple terms, the token ownership is earned through genuine user actions, not airdrops. This reverse thinking is quite interesting: instead of creating false prosperity, it's better to let usage behaviors generate value themselves. From a tokenomics perspective, this indeed breaks many conventional routines of wallet products.