2026-01-10 10:28:38

The essence of on-chain security often boils down to observable transaction behavior. But there is a trap here — when the activity records of malicious wallets are cleared or funds are transferred, they appear on the surface to be normal accounts. The problem is that "appear normal" does not equal "truly secure." Hackers may retain backdoor permissions, unrevoked authorizations, or even maintain ongoing control over the wallet. These hidden risks are fundamentally undetectable through on-chain data.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DaisyUnicorn

· 01-12 13:35

Oh no, this is the pit I keep falling into. A clean surface doesn't mean there's nothing wrong; invisible authorization is the real hidden killer.

View OriginalReply0

SpeakWithHatOn

· 01-10 23:32

That's why just looking at on-chain data is not enough; those hidden risks are the real trump card.

View OriginalReply0

ser_aped.eth

· 01-10 10:58

Bro, you've hit the nail on the head. I'm just worried about those wallets that seem clean on the surface but are actually manipulated behind the scenes. On-chain data really can't defend against such sneaky tactics.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightMEVeater

· 01-10 10:46

Good morning, it's another great time to watch people step into traps. This seemingly normal talk is just like the liquidity trap before a sandwich attack—you think you've made a profit, but in reality, you've been completely drained.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-beba108d

· 01-10 10:42

After reading so many articles about on-chain security, it's still easy to get scammed.

View OriginalReply0