The real issue with how people think about privacy on-chain? Treating it like a simple binary—either fully private or fully transparent. That's the wrong frame entirely. What actually matters is programmable privacy that adapts to what users genuinely need. The key shift: giving data control back to users themselves. You strip away that dependency on 'trust' systems, and suddenly the whole model changes. Users manage their own privacy preferences with flexibility baked into the protocol layer, not forced into rigid all-or-nothing scenarios.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TommyTeacher1
· 01-10 04:42
The binary opposition approach indeed should be discarded, but I really do support the idea of programmable privacy.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropNinja
· 01-10 02:57
Dualism should indeed be discarded; programmable privacy is the way forward.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullAlertOfficer
· 01-09 22:10
The argument about binary privacy has long been outdated; programmable privacy is the right path. However, the problem is that most protocols currently cannot achieve true flexibility, they are just a facade.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobber
· 01-09 22:10
The dualism approach should have been thrown into the trash long ago. Programmable privacy is the right path. Thinking about it this way, it's indeed perfect.
View OriginalReply0
LightningLady
· 01-09 21:55
Dualism should have been thrown into the trash long ago; programmable privacy is the real way out.
The real issue with how people think about privacy on-chain? Treating it like a simple binary—either fully private or fully transparent. That's the wrong frame entirely. What actually matters is programmable privacy that adapts to what users genuinely need. The key shift: giving data control back to users themselves. You strip away that dependency on 'trust' systems, and suddenly the whole model changes. Users manage their own privacy preferences with flexibility baked into the protocol layer, not forced into rigid all-or-nothing scenarios.