To put it more straightforwardly—when AI Agents are truly integrated into trading, risk control, and automated execution, you'll realize that the biggest issue isn't the processing speed, but the fact that their actions vary each time under the same conditions. This unpredictability is a nightmare in high-frequency decision-making.
That's also why some projects adopt a "pre-locked routing" design approach. Instead of letting the Agent make free decisions in complex scenarios, it's better to predefine the decision paths and keep variables within manageable ranges. This ensures consistency in execution while avoiding risk control loopholes.
In other words, in trading scenarios that require precision, predictability > flexibility, stability > efficiency.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RamenDeFiSurvivor
· 01-12 17:01
The consistency issue of AI agents is indeed an invisible killer. Only after stepping on the pit do you understand.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 01-12 10:44
Always giving different answers... This is outrageous. How can I dare to let this thing handle real money?
View OriginalReply0
0xInsomnia
· 01-09 17:52
Honestly, this is the Achilles' heel of AI Agents—the hallucination problem. If it can't be fixed, don't expect it to handle trading.
Uncertainty is truly a major issue; in the same market conditions, it behaves differently every moment, making risk control completely useless.
Pre-lock routing sounds a bit conservative, but isn't it better than liquidation...
Finally, someone has clearly stated that stability > efficiency. Unfortunately, most projects are still hyping up efficiency.
View OriginalReply0
AirDropMissed
· 01-09 17:42
To be honest, that little "intelligence" of AI is useless in trading and is actually a burden. The same market conditions, it does one thing today and something different tomorrow. Who dares to bet?
View OriginalReply0
WagmiOrRekt
· 01-09 17:38
That's right, I gave up on a certain project's Agent plan because it was just too unstable.
To put it more straightforwardly—when AI Agents are truly integrated into trading, risk control, and automated execution, you'll realize that the biggest issue isn't the processing speed, but the fact that their actions vary each time under the same conditions. This unpredictability is a nightmare in high-frequency decision-making.
That's also why some projects adopt a "pre-locked routing" design approach. Instead of letting the Agent make free decisions in complex scenarios, it's better to predefine the decision paths and keep variables within manageable ranges. This ensures consistency in execution while avoiding risk control loopholes.
In other words, in trading scenarios that require precision, predictability > flexibility, stability > efficiency.