When it comes to #美国非农就业数据未达市场预期 's economic model, the most eye-catching and controversial aspect is the mechanism where transaction taxes automatically flow to public welfare.

From a traditional investment perspective, any form of "tax" or "friction" is a stumbling block—it eats into liquidity, suppresses speculative enthusiasm, and ultimately drags down price performance. From this angle, $Max seems to be chaining itself with its own shackles.

But looking at it from another perspective, this ongoing "taxation" isn't also a long-term strategic bet?

It doesn't buy physical assets. In this industry, it purchases the rarest things—pure trust, clear moral coordinates, and a community sense of identity bonded by goodwill. Nowadays, scams, hype, and mutual harm are everywhere, but through code that is immutable and a promise of goodness that cannot be reversed, it builds a "spiritual barrier" that competitors can hardly copy. This design filters out not only profit-seeking investors but also those who truly believe in this理念 and are willing to protect it. This barrier isn't reflected in financial statements, but at critical moments, it can determine how far the project can go and how strong its reputation can be.

So the question is: what does this goodwill-built barrier mean to you?

**One camp** believes: This is a drag on speculative liquidity and a clear efficiency black hole.

**The other camp** counters: This is precisely the ultimate moat for building social trust and sustainable consensus.

Both arguments are valid. What do you think? Let's discuss.