Kaito's latest update is a positive step, but rolling it out universally might be premature. Many projects have been operating steadily for months, and plenty of content creators—who've been putting in consistent work—are now at a disadvantage if they don't meet the new criteria. These creators have been establishing their foothold and maintaining rankings through months of effort. A blanket implementation could undermine their progress without adequate transition time or grandfather clauses. Perhaps a phased approach or exceptions for established participants would be more equitable.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 5h ago
Coming back with this again? Don't rush to promote everything all at once. All the efforts accumulated by veteran players over the past few months would be wasted? If you want to put it nicely, it's called "update and optimization"; if you want to be blunt, it's a complete overhaul. I think Kaito should implement a transition period, at least give these content creators who keep producing some buffer, otherwise it seems to disrespect their efforts too much.
View OriginalReply0
ShamedApeSeller
· 01-09 17:06
NGL, deploying everything all at once like this is really frustrating. People who have worked hard for months are suddenly pushed back to the starting point. The operators are a bit unprofessional.
View OriginalReply0
ThreeHornBlasts
· 01-09 17:05
Another major update disaster... veteran creators are now suffering heavy losses.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapist
· 01-09 17:05
This update is a bit tough. Old creators are being completely blocked. Isn't there a transition period?
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 01-09 17:02
ngl kaito, this update is a bit too aggressive, veteran creators were directly cut off and still have to keep running... there should be some transition period.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 01-09 16:56
Bro, this is outrageous. The project team that worked hard for months is directly sent back to square one? Who can handle this without a transition period?
Kaito's latest update is a positive step, but rolling it out universally might be premature. Many projects have been operating steadily for months, and plenty of content creators—who've been putting in consistent work—are now at a disadvantage if they don't meet the new criteria. These creators have been establishing their foothold and maintaining rankings through months of effort. A blanket implementation could undermine their progress without adequate transition time or grandfather clauses. Perhaps a phased approach or exceptions for established participants would be more equitable.