2026-01-09 16:30:44

Real-world assets (RWA) are gaining popularity, but honestly, the real bottleneck isn't technology; it's how to solve the practical issues of compliance, privacy, and auditing. Most public blockchains excel at open finance experiments, but when it comes to real assets, they hit a wall—data transparency and legal requirements are deadlocks.

That's why some networks are designed from the ground up with this direction in mind. For example, they enable the issuance, trading, and settlement of RWA entirely through privacy smart contracts. Sensitive information such as investor identities, transaction volumes, and holdings are not exposed on the entire network, but the transactions themselves remain verifiable and compliant. This transforms RWA from a conceptual demo into something practically usable, standing firm on legal and commercial grounds.

For asset issuers, the benefits are obvious: significantly lower barriers to on-chain participation. Core data doesn't need to be permanently public on the chain, and there's no need to choose between efficiency and compliance. For investors, settlement speed is improved, while traditional financial security and privacy protections are maintained.

From the perspective of the overall financial system development, RWA cannot be achieved overnight. Financial systems prefer gradual iteration and won't completely overhaul everything from the start. Networks that consider compliance and privacy from the foundational level are more likely to be accepted by major institutions—after all, these are the two aspects that institutions value most.

More and more enterprises are exploring asset on-chain, and those who can provide infrastructure that supports innovation while ensuring compliance will seize the opportunity in this wave. That's why the long-term value of such projects is actually hidden in their adoption process.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasGuzzler

· 4h ago

Ha, finally someone has explained this thoroughly. I believe in the logic of privacy smart contracts, which is much more reliable than those projects that keep touting the DeFi revolution. Institutions are just eating this up; otherwise, why do you think traditional financial giants have been hesitant to enter the space? Basically, it's the two ropes of privacy and compliance—missing one will expose you. Wait, what about those chains claiming to be completely transparent? Wouldn't that mean there's never any hope? This is indeed a good time to test the waters. Whoever manages to balance privacy and compliance first will be the big winner. RWA still needs to be approached slowly; there's no rush. Exactly, the underlying design is crucial. Forward-looking teams have already seen this point. But will privacy contracts be completely ignored by regulators? That's a bit uncertain.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlord

· 01-09 17:00

Neither praise nor criticism, the core issues of RWA are privacy and compliance, while technology is actually the simplest. Most public chains focus on showcasing transparency, but they never consider that the actual asset owners don't want to be exposed.

View OriginalReply0

MevHunter

· 01-09 16:40

That's right, technology has long ceased to be an issue; the key bottleneck is still those legal and regulatory hurdles. Institutions are just playing along; privacy agreements are indeed quite imaginative. Ultimately, large institutions will choose the chains that they understood from the very beginning, that's inevitable. Wait, isn't this what some projects have been talking about all along? Only now is it gaining popularity? The combination of compliance and privacy is indeed the true answer for RWA. The real profit opportunities are hidden in infrastructure, not in hype and concepts.

View OriginalReply0

just_vibin_onchain

· 01-09 16:33

Exactly right, compliance is the true way out for RWA; technology is actually a minor issue. The privacy smart contract approach is indeed excellent—data is not on the chain but can be verified, which is what institutions want. Wait, those chains claiming to be compliant from the bottom up—can they really withstand regulatory scrutiny... I'm a bit worried. Oh my God, finally someone has exposed this truth—not all public chains can play RWA. This round of competition really depends on whose infrastructure is strong enough to meet both innovation and compliance at the same time, which is difficult.

View OriginalReply0

ApeEscapeArtist

· 01-09 16:32

Technology is just the threshold; compliance is the line between life and death... No wonder some chains have thought of this from the very beginning. --- That's right, those institutional folks only buy into this; privacy + compliance are necessary to play. --- RWA might seem simple, but in reality, it's about how to elegantly bring traditional finance stuff onto the chain without fuss. --- Privacy smart contracts are brilliant; finally someone realizes that asset issuers don't want the whole world to see everything. --- So, the winner is whoever can make big institutions feel at ease? It seems this is the real competition point. --- By the way, can ordinary people still participate in this wave, or are they just watching institutions take the lion's share? --- Gradual iteration... sounds conservative but might actually be the safest. Those chains rushing for quick gains are probably going to suffer. --- Meeting both compliance and privacy requirements—once this infrastructure is out, it could dominate all sectors.

View OriginalReply0

PhantomMiner

· 01-09 16:32

It's really the combination of privacy + compliance that is the breakthrough for RWA. Institutional folks have actually been waiting for this for a long time, haha. That's right, technology is actually the least valuable part. Once the underlying design is in place, everything else is just a matter of time. Whoever secures this position in this wave will basically determine the future course.

View OriginalReply0

FloorSweeper

· 01-09 16:31

Ah, once again talking about RWA, but compliance is indeed a tough nut to crack, not something technology alone can solve. Privacy smart contracts sound good, but will major institutions really buy into them? It still depends on implementation. The deadlock between data transparency and legal requirements feels like it can only be slowly unraveled over time. Honestly, whoever first masters the balance of compliance + privacy will win this round. Institutions are the most pragmatic; providing them with privacy guarantees is the most effective approach. Gradual iteration is the way to go; projects that aim for a one-shot leap usually end up failing. Lowering the on-chain entry barrier is a good thing, but how to reassure issuers is the key. Investors are actually easier to please; as long as settlement is quick. The current question is, which network has truly designed these from the ground up? Or are they all just hype? The value of the adoption process is underestimated; this is the long-term track.

View OriginalReply0