2026-01-09 16:29:24

As night falls, a group of people become especially active—during the day they are office workers, but at night they transform into on-chain privacy guardians. One hand holding a coffee, the other managing private keys, all busy with the same task: obscuring naked blockchain transaction records.

When it comes to privacy, many people have thought about it—not wanting their partner to discover they secretly bought a graphics card when transferring funds, not wanting colleagues to know when they go all-in on DeFi, or wanting to vote anonymously in DAO elections for "who does the dishes." These needs may sound trivial, but on the chain, they are genuine pain points.

The $DUSK project was created to solve these kinds of problems. It uses zero-knowledge proof technology to encrypt transactions, making your on-chain activities as if wearing an invisibility cloak. How exactly does it work? When transferring funds, the recipient knows they received money, but others cannot tell where the transaction came from or where it’s going; when staking in DeFi, your principal and yield information are protected; during DAO voting, each person's choice is encrypted, even the project team cannot decrypt it.

Interestingly, this privacy smart contract system is quite flexible in application. Whether it's simple token transfers, complex DeFi strategies, or governance voting, this mechanism can be applied. It’s like giving the entire blockchain ecosystem a pair of "privacy pants."

To sum up $DUSK’s philosophy in one sentence: making privacy no longer a luxury, but a standard for every on-chain user. In an era where information is easily leaked, this idea truly hits the pain points of many people.

DUSK5%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenCreatorOP

· 01-12 16:28

The invisibility cloak analogy is brilliant, but honestly, do we really need on-chain privacy? I'll be straightforward, most people can't even use it. The excuse of being afraid colleagues will find out during a all-in is too ridiculous haha. Transferring invisibly sounds good, but can we really trust zero-knowledge proofs? Or is it just another new trick to scam retail investors? Honestly, privacy should have been standard a long time ago. Why are people only now seriously working on this? Seriously, the example of the graphics card is spot on, it feels like we've been attacked, bro. Wait, does this system really have no black holes... It feels too perfect, which is a bit scary.

View OriginalReply0

TideReceder

· 01-12 11:32

Haha, the example of buying a graphics card is really hilarious. That's how I got noticed by my partner. Privacy should indeed be a basic setting, otherwise on-chain activities are all just performances. Having colleagues see your all-in bets is exhausting. Zero-knowledge proofs should have been popularized long ago; not everything needs to be publicly showcased. I like the fact that DAO voting is anonymous; democracy should be done this way. It seems that $DUSK has grasped the real pain point—it's not about hiding illegal activities, but simply not wanting to be gossiped about. On-chain transparency is a double-edged sword; there should be an exit. This is what Web3 should look like, privacy infrastructure must keep up. Amazing, my on-chain "black history" finally has a chance to be saved. Actually, privacy is freedom; there's nothing to be ashamed of.

View OriginalReply0

LightningAllInHero

· 01-10 03:44

Buying a graphics card is a perfect example, haha, it really is a man's pain point. The term "privacy pants" made me laugh, and the idea behind DUSK is indeed correct. Zero-knowledge proofs should have been popularized long ago; the current on-chain transparency is too much. Anonymous voting on who washes the dishes—that's what a DAO should look like. It feels like DUSK really hits the demand, not a false need. We should have had this kind of infrastructure long ago; privacy should be a standard feature.

View OriginalReply0

ColdWalletAnxiety

· 01-09 16:58

Haha, that segment about secretly buying graphics cards was really on point. I almost exposed myself last time. Privacy is indeed important, but can $DUSK really be implemented? It feels like these project slogans are always very loud. Zero-knowledge proofs sound awesome, but I'm worried that in practice they might be too complicated to use... Anonymous voting for who does the dishes—this demand is truly unique, haha. We've heard too many stories about privacy coins; the key is whether someone can actually make them work. On-chain, everything can be checked—that's what annoys me the most. Privacy pants... your analogy made me laugh, but reliability is the key, right? If this thing really could protect privacy, my DeFi account wouldn't have to be so anxious every day.

View OriginalReply0

StableGeniusDegen

· 01-09 16:57

Really, it's already too late to start caring about privacy now. I've already been thoroughly exposed, haha. The part about secretly buying graphics cards was hilarious. I won't say how I was discovered. Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but you only really know if they are reliable when you actually use them. Anonymous voting during a all-in game is a must for me. I don't want the entire DAO to know how bad I am. DUSK's approach is good, but I don't know how long this encryption system can last. Privacy is always a high-risk, high-reward game.

View OriginalReply0

FarmHopper

· 01-09 16:56

The analogy of privacy pants is brilliant haha, but honestly, who hasn't secretly bought a graphics card... DUSK's zero-knowledge proof system truly addresses the pain points.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureAnxiety

· 01-09 16:55

Laughing to death, transferring money to buy graphics cards still has to be sneaky. Is this the daily life of Web3? --- Zero-knowledge proofs sound very advanced, but frankly, it's none of anyone's business. --- The privacy pants analogy is brilliant, but can Dusk become popular? It seems many privacy coins have sunk. --- Feels like I'm supporting Dusk here, this article is full of marketing vibes. --- DAO voting still needs to be anonymous, how scared must people be of others knowing who they voted for? --- Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed impressive, but there’s no real privacy on the chain, it can always be tracked through on-chain analysis. --- I just want to know if exchanges will support this kind of privacy coin, otherwise it’s really useless. --- Basically, just want to rug openly without being caught. Privacy tech can always be exploited by bad actors. --- This trick of not being able to trace the other party during transfer is awesome, I’ve learned it. --- Honestly, privacy should really be standard, but how do regulators view such projects? That’s the real issue.

View OriginalReply0

ThreeHornBlasts