Stablecoin stability: Where's the line? Take sUSD as an example—it's hit below $0.85 three times in the past year alone. At what point does repeated depegging disqualify something from calling itself stable? Once? Twice? The market's watching closely as these so-called stablecoins struggle to maintain their peg. When a token designed to stay at $1 breaks its promise that frequently, it raises serious questions about its actual utility and reserve backing. Are we being too lenient with what we label as "stable" in this space?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasGuzzler
· 5h ago
Three de-pegs? That's still called a stablecoin? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
VibesOverCharts
· 23h ago
Three decouplings and still dare to call it a stablecoin, isn't that funny?
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBearDrawer
· 01-09 16:58
Laughing out loud, sUSD drops to 0.85 and still calls itself a stablecoin? Isn't this insulting our intelligence?
View OriginalReply0
SchrödingersNode
· 01-09 16:58
sUSD has fallen below 0.85 three times? That's really unstable; is this still called a stablecoin?
View OriginalReply0
ponzi_poet
· 01-09 16:57
Coming again? sUSD has dropped to 0.85, and you still dare to call it a stablecoin. I really can't hold it anymore.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunster
· 01-09 16:53
Laughing and losing this one, sUSD de-pegged three times, is this called "stability"? I spit on that.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleSurfer
· 01-09 16:51
sUSD has dropped to 0.85, and you still dare to call it a stablecoin? Isn't this just nominal fraud by stablecoins? LOL
View OriginalReply0
DeFiVeteran
· 01-09 16:29
Someone should have said it earlier, sUSD this piece of crap shouldn't be called a stablecoin. It keeps dropping below 0.85, and it still dares to boast? Truly outrageous.
Stablecoin stability: Where's the line? Take sUSD as an example—it's hit below $0.85 three times in the past year alone. At what point does repeated depegging disqualify something from calling itself stable? Once? Twice? The market's watching closely as these so-called stablecoins struggle to maintain their peg. When a token designed to stay at $1 breaks its promise that frequently, it raises serious questions about its actual utility and reserve backing. Are we being too lenient with what we label as "stable" in this space?