There have been some interesting changes in the ZEC ecosystem recently. The development team, due to disagreements over governance philosophy, collectively decided to create a project called CashZ. At first glance, it seems quite chaotic, but upon closer inspection, it’s actually quite interesting—CashZ still focuses on the development of the ZEC protocol itself, built based on the Zashi codebase, and positioned as a privacy wallet solution within the ZEC ecosystem.
This makes people a bit confused. Is CashZ competing with ZEC, or is it just another way of continuing to serve the ZEC ecosystem?
Actually, this is the beauty of the open-source ecosystem. The code is available, and anyone capable can take over maintenance, free from the constraints of any single organization. If there are disagreements within the team, they can go their separate ways. Have better ideas? Fork a new branch. This level of freedom is something centralized structures simply cannot provide. Ultimately, whether a route is successful or not will be decided by the market and users through their support.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoWageSlave
· 10h ago
Basically, it's the beauty of open source; parting ways still allows each to shine.
View OriginalReply0
MevShadowranger
· 01-11 15:49
Haha, splitting out to create CashZ, honestly it's still for ZEC's benefit, just a different approach.
View OriginalReply0
HashRatePhilosopher
· 01-09 16:57
Basically, that's the charm of open source—team disagreements can actually lead to two good projects.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122
· 01-09 16:51
To be honest, I've seen a lot of internal conflicts like this, but ZEC is really different this time — it's not a tearing apart and splitting, but rather each side playing to their strengths.
View OriginalReply0
MemeEchoer
· 01-09 16:44
Haha, this is the charm of open source. When disagreements arise, we part ways and each prove ourselves.
View OriginalReply0
LucidSleepwalker
· 01-09 16:42
Hey, I've seen this routine too many times: division → each going their own way → in the end, whoever survives better wins
View OriginalReply0
PumpDetector
· 01-09 16:35
fork wars never end well... or do they? 👀 watched this play out since mt gox days, always the same pattern—ideological split, code divergence, then market decides. zec holders caught in the crossfire tho, ngl. who's actually maintaining what anymore?
Reply0
DataChief
· 01-09 16:33
Another palace intrigue drama, I've seen developers sabotage each other too many times. The key still depends on code quality.
There have been some interesting changes in the ZEC ecosystem recently. The development team, due to disagreements over governance philosophy, collectively decided to create a project called CashZ. At first glance, it seems quite chaotic, but upon closer inspection, it’s actually quite interesting—CashZ still focuses on the development of the ZEC protocol itself, built based on the Zashi codebase, and positioned as a privacy wallet solution within the ZEC ecosystem.
This makes people a bit confused. Is CashZ competing with ZEC, or is it just another way of continuing to serve the ZEC ecosystem?
Actually, this is the beauty of the open-source ecosystem. The code is available, and anyone capable can take over maintenance, free from the constraints of any single organization. If there are disagreements within the team, they can go their separate ways. Have better ideas? Fork a new branch. This level of freedom is something centralized structures simply cannot provide. Ultimately, whether a route is successful or not will be decided by the market and users through their support.