The blockchain landscape has undergone radical transformation since its inception. What began as Bitcoin’s answer to decentralized payments has blossomed into a sprawling ecosystem supporting DeFi, gaming, NFTs, and the metaverse. Yet one persistent challenge haunts the space: throughput limitations.
Bitcoin processes just 7 transactions per second. Ethereum’s base layer handles around 15 TPS—both pale compared to Visa’s 1,700 TPS. This gap isn’t merely a technical footnote; it’s the central bottleneck preventing mainstream adoption.
Enter Layer-2 crypto coins and protocols. These secondary frameworks operate atop foundational blockchains, fundamentally restructuring how transactions flow through the network. By shifting computational work off the main chain, Layer-2 solutions unlock the trilemma’s promise: scalability without sacrificing security or decentralization.
Understanding Layer-2: The Architecture of Speed
At its foundation, Layer-2 operates on a simple principle: batch transactions off-chain, then anchor them to the mainnet in consolidated bundles. This separation of concerns transforms network dynamics entirely.
Instead of every transaction consuming mainnet resources, Layer-2 systems handle volume locally. Only cryptographic proofs or rollup summaries settle on-chain. The result? Congestion evaporates, fees plummet, and throughput multiplies exponentially.
Think of it as creating dedicated processing corridors parallel to the main highway. Traffic that previously clogged Ethereum or Bitcoin now flows through specialized channels, returning only when finality requires.
Why Layer-2 Matters for Growth
Accessibility for DeFi and Gaming: Layer-2 crypto coins enable yield farming, trading, and blockchain gaming without prohibitive costs. A swap that costs $50 on Ethereum might cost pennies on Layer-2, fundamentally changing participation dynamics.
Developer Economics: Projects building on Layer-2 benefit from lower barriers to entry. Smart contract deployment costs drop dramatically, attracting teams that might otherwise build elsewhere.
User Experience: Transactions confirm in seconds rather than minutes. This speed differential alone drives adoption—real-time responsiveness users expect from Web2 apps becomes possible.
The Scaling Stack: L1, L2, and L3
Blockchain scalability exists across multiple tiers. Understanding each level reveals how modern networks actually function:
Layer 1 represents the foundation—Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Solana. These chains provide unmatched security but accept throughput tradeoffs. All core consensus logic and settlement happens here.
Layer 2 introduces specialized processing. Transactions execute off-chain with proofs or optimistic assumptions validating batches on-chain. Security remains anchored to L1 while throughput multiplies.
Layer 3 builds further abstractions atop Layer-2, enabling application-specific optimization. While emerging, these protocols promise hyper-customization for specialized use cases.
Your choice depends entirely on requirements: Layer 1 for maximum security and decentralization, Layer 2 for optimal speed-to-security tradeoffs, Layer 3 for bespoke functionality.
Technical Approaches: How Different Layer-2 Coins Work
Layer-2 solutions employ distinct mechanisms. Each architecture reflects different tradeoffs between finality speed, computational efficiency, and developer experience.
Optimistic Rollups: Trust with Verification
Optimistic Rollups process transactions assuming validity unless proven otherwise. They bundle hundreds of transactions into single on-chain proofs, reducing data requirements dramatically.
Advantages: Fast transaction processing (2,000+ TPS), straightforward implementation, developer-friendly tooling.
Disadvantages: Requires fraud-proof mechanisms for security, introducing dispute periods before finality.
Leading projects using this approach: Arbitrum (ARB) and Optimism (OP).
Zero-Knowledge Rollups: Privacy and Efficiency Combined
ZK-Rollups create cryptographic proofs proving transaction validity without revealing transaction details. These “succinct proofs” compress massive transaction sets into minimal data.
Advantages: High privacy, theoretical million+ TPS scaling, reduced finality delays.
Notable practitioners: Manta Network (MANTA), Starknet, and others.
Plasma and Validium: Specialized Approaches
Plasma chains function as quasi-independent sidechains linked to Ethereum. Validium extends ZK concepts by moving validation off-chain while maintaining security guarantees.
Plasma benefits: Massive throughput (9,000+ TPS), specialized for specific use cases like gaming.
Validium benefits: Combines zk-proof security with practical efficiency.
Immutable X (IMX) exemplifies Validium’s gaming focus.
The 2025 Layer-2 Landscape: Projects Worth Watching
Current market conditions favor established players while emerging protocols vie for traction. Here’s the actual state of leading Layer-2 crypto coins:
Arbitrum commands approximately 51% of Ethereum Layer-2 TVL, establishing market dominance through proven infrastructure. The network processes 4,000 TPS—40x Ethereum’s capacity—while reducing gas costs by 95%.
Its developer ecosystem rivals Ethereum itself. DeFi protocols, NFT platforms, and gaming projects built on Arbitrum benefit from minimal friction and substantial liquidity pools.
ARB token governance enables community participation in protocol evolution, positioning the network toward genuine decentralization despite inherent L1 security linkages.
Optimism represents the philosophical counter to Arbitrum—equally capable technically, yet differentiated through governance structure and ecosystem focus. The network achieves 4,000 TPS with 90% gas reduction versus Ethereum.
OP token distribution emphasizes community participation from genesis. The protocol explicitly targets self-governance, with governance tasks delegating to token holders for democratic operation.
Notably, Optimism’s technical stack (OP Stack) enables other protocols to launch compatible chains, creating network effects extending beyond the core network.
Polygon operates differently than pure rollups—it’s a multi-chain ecosystem offering diverse scaling solutions. ZK-Rollups for privacy, Proof-of-Stake sidechains for flexibility.
With 65,000+ TPS capacity, Polygon vastly exceeds conventional Layer-2 throughput. The ecosystem encompasses Aave, SushiSwap, Curve and dominant NFT platforms, establishing genuine network effects.
Polygon’s flexibility makes it ideal for projects uncertain which scaling approach best serves their needs.
Base (Coinbase’s L2)
Current Price: Not independently traded | TVL: $729M | Technology: Optimistic Rollup
Coinbase’s Layer-2 entry uses the proven OP Stack, leveraging existing battle-tested infrastructure. Base targets 2,000 TPS with 95% gas reduction.
Its competitive advantage stems from Coinbase’s brand recognition and user base rather than novel technology. For retail users seeking native Ethereum compatibility without complex bridging, Base provides familiar entry points.
As institutional adoption accelerates, Base may capture substantial market share through distribution advantages alone.
Manta Network (MANTA)
Current Price: $0.08 | Market Cap: $37.39M | Technology: ZK-Rollup
Manta stands apart through privacy-first design. Zero-knowledge cryptography underpins every transaction, ensuring confidentiality alongside scalability.
Recent performance catapulted Manta to third-largest Ethereum Layer-2 by TVL—a remarkable achievement for a privacy-focused protocol. This suggests market appetite for confidential DeFi exceeds conventional expectations.
Manta Pacific handles 4,000 TPS while Manta Atlantic manages identity infrastructure through zero-knowledge sovereign identity proofs.
Immutable X (IMX)
Current Price: $0.27 | Market Cap: $224.18M | Technology: Validium
Immutable X carved its niche through gaming specialization. The protocol achieves 9,000+ TPS with minimal fees—precisely what gaming economics require.
Gaming represents blockchain’s largest consumer use case. IMX’s focus on this vertical, combined with established game partnerships, positions it as gaming infrastructure layer rather than generic Layer-2.
TVL of $169 million reflects active ecosystem engagement, particularly in NFT minting and trading infrastructure.
Coti (COTI)
Current Price: $0.02 | Market Cap: $56.75M | Technology: ZK-Rollup (transitioning from Cardano)
Coti’s pivot from Cardano Layer-2 to Ethereum Layer-2 reflects strategic reevaluation. The migration preserves privacy features (garbled circuits) while adopting EVM compatibility.
This transition enables Ethereum developers to build privacy-focused applications without learning new ecosystems, potentially attracting developers frustrated by privacy limitations elsewhere.
Starknet
Current Price: Not independently traded | Technology: ZK-Rollup (STARK Proofs)
Starknet employs STARK proofs—a cutting-edge zero-knowledge approach theoretically supporting millions of TPS. The network achieves 2,000-4,000 TPS currently while pursuing further optimization.
Cairo programming language native to Starknet enables powerful abstractions but requires developer adaptation. Despite smaller adoption than Arbitrum, Starknet attracts developers prioritizing technical sophistication.
Dymension
Current Price: Not independently traded | Technology: RollApps (Modular Design)
Dymension introduces modularity to Layer-2 design. Rather than single monolithic rollup, Dymension hosts specialized RollApps—each optimized for specific use cases.
This modular approach enables individual chains to scale independently without impacting network stability. Developers customize consensus mechanisms, data availability, and execution environments per application requirements.
Interoperability through IBC protocol connects Dymension to the broader Cosmos ecosystem, expanding reach beyond Ethereum-centric chains.
Lightning Network
Current Price: Not applicable | TVL: $198M+ | Technology: Bi-directional Payment Channels
Theoretical throughput reaches one million TPS. Practical throughput depends on network liquidity and user adoption. Recent growth suggests mainstream Bitcoin users increasingly recognize Lightning’s utility for micropayments and daily transactions.
Ethereum 2.0’s Implications for Layer-2 Evolution
Ethereum 2.0 doesn’t render Layer-2 obsolete—it enhances them. Proto-Danksharding, arriving in Ethereum’s upcoming phases, optimizes data availability for rollup sequencers.
Impact on Layer-2 crypto coins:
Rollup throughput increases substantially as Proto-Danksharding reduces data costs. What currently costs $0.01 per transaction might cost $0.001.
Transaction finality improves. Faster Layer-1 confirmation enables quicker Layer-2 settlement, reducing user wait times for cross-layer operations.
Network synergy strengthens. Ethereum 1 and Layer-2 systems increasingly function as unified ecosystem rather than separate components. Users seamlessly move between layers without noticing technical distinctions.
This complementary evolution means Layer-2 solutions don’t compete with Ethereum 2.0—they amplify it. The future involves coordinated scaling across multiple layers simultaneously.
Selecting Your Layer-2: Decision Framework
Choosing among competing Layer-2 crypto coins depends on specific needs:
For maximum DeFi liquidity: Arbitrum or Polygon offer deepest protocol integration and largest total value locked.
For gaming and NFTs: Immutable X provides specialized optimization for these verticals.
For privacy focus: Manta Network or Coti provide confidentiality alongside scalability.
For developer flexibility: Optimism’s OP Stack enables building compatible chains, appealing to infrastructure builders.
For Bitcoin users: Lightning Network remains the proven layer-2 scaling solution, with increasing adoption for everyday transactions.
For experimental cryptography: Starknet attracts developers comfortable with cutting-edge zero-knowledge approaches.
The Layer-2 Future
Layer-2 crypto coins have evolved from experimental scaling approaches to essential infrastructure. Their maturation represents genuine progress toward blockchain’s mainstream vision.
Speed, affordability, and user experience—the core promises of blockchain technology—become practically achievable through Layer-2 solutions. Whether optimistic rollups, zero-knowledge systems, or specialized sidechains, these technologies fundamentally transform blockchain economics.
2025 will likely accelerate this consolidation. Leading Layer-2 networks gain lock-in advantages through established liquidity and developer ecosystems. Newer entrants must differentiate through novel technical approaches or application-specific optimization.
The result: blockchain finally approaching Web2 user experience standards while maintaining decentralization and security guarantees. Layer-2 solutions make this future tangible.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Layer-2 Crypto Coins: Which Solutions Will Dominate in 2025?
The blockchain landscape has undergone radical transformation since its inception. What began as Bitcoin’s answer to decentralized payments has blossomed into a sprawling ecosystem supporting DeFi, gaming, NFTs, and the metaverse. Yet one persistent challenge haunts the space: throughput limitations.
Bitcoin processes just 7 transactions per second. Ethereum’s base layer handles around 15 TPS—both pale compared to Visa’s 1,700 TPS. This gap isn’t merely a technical footnote; it’s the central bottleneck preventing mainstream adoption.
Enter Layer-2 crypto coins and protocols. These secondary frameworks operate atop foundational blockchains, fundamentally restructuring how transactions flow through the network. By shifting computational work off the main chain, Layer-2 solutions unlock the trilemma’s promise: scalability without sacrificing security or decentralization.
Understanding Layer-2: The Architecture of Speed
At its foundation, Layer-2 operates on a simple principle: batch transactions off-chain, then anchor them to the mainnet in consolidated bundles. This separation of concerns transforms network dynamics entirely.
Instead of every transaction consuming mainnet resources, Layer-2 systems handle volume locally. Only cryptographic proofs or rollup summaries settle on-chain. The result? Congestion evaporates, fees plummet, and throughput multiplies exponentially.
Think of it as creating dedicated processing corridors parallel to the main highway. Traffic that previously clogged Ethereum or Bitcoin now flows through specialized channels, returning only when finality requires.
Why Layer-2 Matters for Growth
Accessibility for DeFi and Gaming: Layer-2 crypto coins enable yield farming, trading, and blockchain gaming without prohibitive costs. A swap that costs $50 on Ethereum might cost pennies on Layer-2, fundamentally changing participation dynamics.
Developer Economics: Projects building on Layer-2 benefit from lower barriers to entry. Smart contract deployment costs drop dramatically, attracting teams that might otherwise build elsewhere.
User Experience: Transactions confirm in seconds rather than minutes. This speed differential alone drives adoption—real-time responsiveness users expect from Web2 apps becomes possible.
The Scaling Stack: L1, L2, and L3
Blockchain scalability exists across multiple tiers. Understanding each level reveals how modern networks actually function:
Layer 1 represents the foundation—Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Solana. These chains provide unmatched security but accept throughput tradeoffs. All core consensus logic and settlement happens here.
Layer 2 introduces specialized processing. Transactions execute off-chain with proofs or optimistic assumptions validating batches on-chain. Security remains anchored to L1 while throughput multiplies.
Layer 3 builds further abstractions atop Layer-2, enabling application-specific optimization. While emerging, these protocols promise hyper-customization for specialized use cases.
Your choice depends entirely on requirements: Layer 1 for maximum security and decentralization, Layer 2 for optimal speed-to-security tradeoffs, Layer 3 for bespoke functionality.
Technical Approaches: How Different Layer-2 Coins Work
Layer-2 solutions employ distinct mechanisms. Each architecture reflects different tradeoffs between finality speed, computational efficiency, and developer experience.
Optimistic Rollups: Trust with Verification
Optimistic Rollups process transactions assuming validity unless proven otherwise. They bundle hundreds of transactions into single on-chain proofs, reducing data requirements dramatically.
Advantages: Fast transaction processing (2,000+ TPS), straightforward implementation, developer-friendly tooling.
Disadvantages: Requires fraud-proof mechanisms for security, introducing dispute periods before finality.
Leading projects using this approach: Arbitrum (ARB) and Optimism (OP).
Zero-Knowledge Rollups: Privacy and Efficiency Combined
ZK-Rollups create cryptographic proofs proving transaction validity without revealing transaction details. These “succinct proofs” compress massive transaction sets into minimal data.
Advantages: High privacy, theoretical million+ TPS scaling, reduced finality delays.
Disadvantages: Complex cryptography, higher computational costs, smaller developer ecosystem.
Notable practitioners: Manta Network (MANTA), Starknet, and others.
Plasma and Validium: Specialized Approaches
Plasma chains function as quasi-independent sidechains linked to Ethereum. Validium extends ZK concepts by moving validation off-chain while maintaining security guarantees.
Plasma benefits: Massive throughput (9,000+ TPS), specialized for specific use cases like gaming.
Validium benefits: Combines zk-proof security with practical efficiency.
Immutable X (IMX) exemplifies Validium’s gaming focus.
The 2025 Layer-2 Landscape: Projects Worth Watching
Current market conditions favor established players while emerging protocols vie for traction. Here’s the actual state of leading Layer-2 crypto coins:
Arbitrum (ARB)
Current Price: $0.21 | Market Cap: $1.22B | Technology: Optimistic Rollup
Arbitrum commands approximately 51% of Ethereum Layer-2 TVL, establishing market dominance through proven infrastructure. The network processes 4,000 TPS—40x Ethereum’s capacity—while reducing gas costs by 95%.
Its developer ecosystem rivals Ethereum itself. DeFi protocols, NFT platforms, and gaming projects built on Arbitrum benefit from minimal friction and substantial liquidity pools.
ARB token governance enables community participation in protocol evolution, positioning the network toward genuine decentralization despite inherent L1 security linkages.
Optimism (OP)
Current Price: $0.32 | Market Cap: $615.50M | Technology: Optimistic Rollup
Optimism represents the philosophical counter to Arbitrum—equally capable technically, yet differentiated through governance structure and ecosystem focus. The network achieves 4,000 TPS with 90% gas reduction versus Ethereum.
OP token distribution emphasizes community participation from genesis. The protocol explicitly targets self-governance, with governance tasks delegating to token holders for democratic operation.
Notably, Optimism’s technical stack (OP Stack) enables other protocols to launch compatible chains, creating network effects extending beyond the core network.
Polygon (MATIC)
Current Price: Ongoing market prices | Market Cap: $7.5B+ (historical) | Technology: Multi-tech (ZK-Rollups, Sidechains)
Polygon operates differently than pure rollups—it’s a multi-chain ecosystem offering diverse scaling solutions. ZK-Rollups for privacy, Proof-of-Stake sidechains for flexibility.
With 65,000+ TPS capacity, Polygon vastly exceeds conventional Layer-2 throughput. The ecosystem encompasses Aave, SushiSwap, Curve and dominant NFT platforms, establishing genuine network effects.
Polygon’s flexibility makes it ideal for projects uncertain which scaling approach best serves their needs.
Base (Coinbase’s L2)
Current Price: Not independently traded | TVL: $729M | Technology: Optimistic Rollup
Coinbase’s Layer-2 entry uses the proven OP Stack, leveraging existing battle-tested infrastructure. Base targets 2,000 TPS with 95% gas reduction.
Its competitive advantage stems from Coinbase’s brand recognition and user base rather than novel technology. For retail users seeking native Ethereum compatibility without complex bridging, Base provides familiar entry points.
As institutional adoption accelerates, Base may capture substantial market share through distribution advantages alone.
Manta Network (MANTA)
Current Price: $0.08 | Market Cap: $37.39M | Technology: ZK-Rollup
Manta stands apart through privacy-first design. Zero-knowledge cryptography underpins every transaction, ensuring confidentiality alongside scalability.
Recent performance catapulted Manta to third-largest Ethereum Layer-2 by TVL—a remarkable achievement for a privacy-focused protocol. This suggests market appetite for confidential DeFi exceeds conventional expectations.
Manta Pacific handles 4,000 TPS while Manta Atlantic manages identity infrastructure through zero-knowledge sovereign identity proofs.
Immutable X (IMX)
Current Price: $0.27 | Market Cap: $224.18M | Technology: Validium
Immutable X carved its niche through gaming specialization. The protocol achieves 9,000+ TPS with minimal fees—precisely what gaming economics require.
Gaming represents blockchain’s largest consumer use case. IMX’s focus on this vertical, combined with established game partnerships, positions it as gaming infrastructure layer rather than generic Layer-2.
TVL of $169 million reflects active ecosystem engagement, particularly in NFT minting and trading infrastructure.
Coti (COTI)
Current Price: $0.02 | Market Cap: $56.75M | Technology: ZK-Rollup (transitioning from Cardano)
Coti’s pivot from Cardano Layer-2 to Ethereum Layer-2 reflects strategic reevaluation. The migration preserves privacy features (garbled circuits) while adopting EVM compatibility.
This transition enables Ethereum developers to build privacy-focused applications without learning new ecosystems, potentially attracting developers frustrated by privacy limitations elsewhere.
Starknet
Current Price: Not independently traded | Technology: ZK-Rollup (STARK Proofs)
Starknet employs STARK proofs—a cutting-edge zero-knowledge approach theoretically supporting millions of TPS. The network achieves 2,000-4,000 TPS currently while pursuing further optimization.
Cairo programming language native to Starknet enables powerful abstractions but requires developer adaptation. Despite smaller adoption than Arbitrum, Starknet attracts developers prioritizing technical sophistication.
Dymension
Current Price: Not independently traded | Technology: RollApps (Modular Design)
Dymension introduces modularity to Layer-2 design. Rather than single monolithic rollup, Dymension hosts specialized RollApps—each optimized for specific use cases.
This modular approach enables individual chains to scale independently without impacting network stability. Developers customize consensus mechanisms, data availability, and execution environments per application requirements.
Interoperability through IBC protocol connects Dymension to the broader Cosmos ecosystem, expanding reach beyond Ethereum-centric chains.
Lightning Network
Current Price: Not applicable | TVL: $198M+ | Technology: Bi-directional Payment Channels
Lightning Network remains Bitcoin’s primary scaling solution. Unlike rollups, Lightning uses payment channels enabling peer-to-peer transactions off-chain with on-chain settlement for disputes only.
Theoretical throughput reaches one million TPS. Practical throughput depends on network liquidity and user adoption. Recent growth suggests mainstream Bitcoin users increasingly recognize Lightning’s utility for micropayments and daily transactions.
Ethereum 2.0’s Implications for Layer-2 Evolution
Ethereum 2.0 doesn’t render Layer-2 obsolete—it enhances them. Proto-Danksharding, arriving in Ethereum’s upcoming phases, optimizes data availability for rollup sequencers.
Impact on Layer-2 crypto coins:
Rollup throughput increases substantially as Proto-Danksharding reduces data costs. What currently costs $0.01 per transaction might cost $0.001.
Transaction finality improves. Faster Layer-1 confirmation enables quicker Layer-2 settlement, reducing user wait times for cross-layer operations.
Network synergy strengthens. Ethereum 1 and Layer-2 systems increasingly function as unified ecosystem rather than separate components. Users seamlessly move between layers without noticing technical distinctions.
This complementary evolution means Layer-2 solutions don’t compete with Ethereum 2.0—they amplify it. The future involves coordinated scaling across multiple layers simultaneously.
Selecting Your Layer-2: Decision Framework
Choosing among competing Layer-2 crypto coins depends on specific needs:
For maximum DeFi liquidity: Arbitrum or Polygon offer deepest protocol integration and largest total value locked.
For gaming and NFTs: Immutable X provides specialized optimization for these verticals.
For privacy focus: Manta Network or Coti provide confidentiality alongside scalability.
For developer flexibility: Optimism’s OP Stack enables building compatible chains, appealing to infrastructure builders.
For Bitcoin users: Lightning Network remains the proven layer-2 scaling solution, with increasing adoption for everyday transactions.
For experimental cryptography: Starknet attracts developers comfortable with cutting-edge zero-knowledge approaches.
The Layer-2 Future
Layer-2 crypto coins have evolved from experimental scaling approaches to essential infrastructure. Their maturation represents genuine progress toward blockchain’s mainstream vision.
Speed, affordability, and user experience—the core promises of blockchain technology—become practically achievable through Layer-2 solutions. Whether optimistic rollups, zero-knowledge systems, or specialized sidechains, these technologies fundamentally transform blockchain economics.
2025 will likely accelerate this consolidation. Leading Layer-2 networks gain lock-in advantages through established liquidity and developer ecosystems. Newer entrants must differentiate through novel technical approaches or application-specific optimization.
The result: blockchain finally approaching Web2 user experience standards while maintaining decentralization and security guarantees. Layer-2 solutions make this future tangible.