The crypto ecosystem in 2025 is undergoing a fundamental overhaul of its underlying logic. This time, the focus is not on short-term market fluctuations but on a battle for "node economy."
A recent phenomenon is quite evident: a large number of institutions and individuals are beginning to concentrate their funds and computing power into nodes of new validation protocols. This is not just following trends but participating in a reallocation of "computing power distribution rights."
**Evolution of the Node Revenue Model**
In the past, operating nodes for Layer2 or DePIN projects was essentially hard labor. You needed to store massive redundant data, perform repetitive calculations, and could only earn meager subsidies. Hardware depreciation was fast, and returns were low—this was a common scenario.
New protocols have changed this logic. They introduce a mechanism called "lightweight validation"—nodes no longer need to fully synchronize all on-chain data but only act as "truth arbiters" during critical calculations. As a result, hardware requirements decrease, but participation and earnings actually increase. Some estimates suggest hardware costs can be reduced by 30-50%, while efficiency can improve by 3-5 times.
**Building Multi-Dimensional Revenue Streams**
The sources of income for participating in these projects have become more complex. At the basic level, you can earn task rewards by staking a mainstream public chain token or the native token of the project. But this is just the first layer.
As the ecosystem expands, nodes can also generate additional income from application scenarios within the ecosystem. AI training, data validation, cross-chain settlement—each link can create new revenue points. This is not just a single mining profit but involves participating in the entire ecosystem's value circulation.
**Why This Wave Is Different**
The crypto market has experienced many node booms over the past few years, but most ultimately turned into "mining farm games"—competing over hardware, electricity costs, and scale. The final winners were those with industrial-grade infrastructure.
This time, the difference lies in significantly lowering the barriers to entry. Small and medium participants can leverage less capital to achieve relatively good returns. The protocols themselves are designed to avoid extreme centralization—through task decentralization, diversified rewards, and other mechanisms, ensuring a more balanced distribution of benefits among ecosystem participants.
**How Big Is the Current Node Market?**
According to some on-chain data, the total staked amount of major validation protocols' nodes has already surpassed several billion dollars. The number of active participating nodes is also growing by over 50% month-over-month. This indicates that the market is indeed reallocating resources.
What does this mean for ordinary investors? If you are optimistic about the development of Web3 infrastructure, participating in the node economy might be a more stable choice than pure secondary market trading. Of course, choosing which protocol to support and how to manage risks still requires research.
In summary, the node battle of 2025 has just begun. This competition is not about who has the most powerful graphics card but about who can participate more intelligently in the distribution of ecosystem value.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainBard
· 8h ago
Are we doing lightweight validation again? Sounds nice, but I still want to see actual profit data before making any judgments.
If we really want to cut hardware costs by 50%, why are so many big players still frantically stacking machines?
Opportunities for small and medium players to pick up bargains? Uh... history shows that the ending is usually being cut off.
By the way, can this wave of protocol design truly avoid centralization? I'm a bit skeptical.
Billions of dollars in staking sounds impressive, but I don't know how much will actually end up in retail investors' hands.
I've been doing staking mining for a few years, and it feels like the routines are all the same, just a different coat of paint.
A 50% monthly increase sounds exaggerated; we need to account for fake volume and羊毛党 (wool party, i.e., opportunists).
Lightweight validation sounds like shifting technical debt elsewhere; it's not that simple.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretter
· 8h ago
Is it just good talk, or is there another round of rug pulls? I was already exhausted from losing money the last time I heard about "multi-dimensional收益."
If hardware costs are cut by 50%, how come big players still make money? Can't figure it out.
The node economy scheme is just fooling more people into joining.
"Lightweight verification" sounds good, but you have to run it yourself to see how it actually performs.
A multi-billion dollar market, but in the end, isn't it just the leading project team running away?
Don't listen to this nonsense; you still need to look at the project's background and actual TVL data. Don't go all-in foolishly.
2025 is another "new round," right? Why didn't I hear about it last year?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaser
· 8h ago
Is it nodes again? This round is up, but the idea of saving 50% on hardware costs is indeed interesting.
---
Lightweight verification sounds good, but I'm worried it might just be another game of cutting the leeks, with the big players still eating the meat.
---
Building multi-dimensional收益... Basically, it still depends on whether the project team is reliable. If you choose the wrong one, everything is pointless.
---
A few billion-dollar projects, with a 50% month-over-month growth—these numbers sound a bit unbelievable.
---
Can small and medium participants buy the dip? I want to see how else they can earn besides staking. Don’t turn it into Mining Farm 2.0 in the end.
---
Reallocating computing power distribution rights—this concept is being hyped quite a bit. I wonder if it can be implemented by the end of the year.
---
Reducing costs and improving efficiency, sounds like the DePIN story from a couple of years ago. But what’s the result...
---
Does anyone really earn thousands a month from nodes, or is it just another topic generator?
View OriginalReply0
CommunityWorker
· 8h ago
Lightweight verification really lowers the barrier to entry; finally no need to pile up hardware
Well said, nodes used to be just mining farm games, now there's a real sense of democratization
A node staking amount of billions of dollars, that's no small feat; a 50% monthly growth is quite aggressive
Hardware costs cut in half with efficiency tripled? How is this number calculated? It seems a bit suspicious
I understand the multi-dimensional profit logic, but choosing the right protocol still requires caution; risks are still present
Is the node competition just beginning? It feels like someone is already quietly making a fortune
It seems that small and medium players do have a chance, but the prerequisite is not to get cut off
The crypto ecosystem in 2025 is undergoing a fundamental overhaul of its underlying logic. This time, the focus is not on short-term market fluctuations but on a battle for "node economy."
A recent phenomenon is quite evident: a large number of institutions and individuals are beginning to concentrate their funds and computing power into nodes of new validation protocols. This is not just following trends but participating in a reallocation of "computing power distribution rights."
**Evolution of the Node Revenue Model**
In the past, operating nodes for Layer2 or DePIN projects was essentially hard labor. You needed to store massive redundant data, perform repetitive calculations, and could only earn meager subsidies. Hardware depreciation was fast, and returns were low—this was a common scenario.
New protocols have changed this logic. They introduce a mechanism called "lightweight validation"—nodes no longer need to fully synchronize all on-chain data but only act as "truth arbiters" during critical calculations. As a result, hardware requirements decrease, but participation and earnings actually increase. Some estimates suggest hardware costs can be reduced by 30-50%, while efficiency can improve by 3-5 times.
**Building Multi-Dimensional Revenue Streams**
The sources of income for participating in these projects have become more complex. At the basic level, you can earn task rewards by staking a mainstream public chain token or the native token of the project. But this is just the first layer.
As the ecosystem expands, nodes can also generate additional income from application scenarios within the ecosystem. AI training, data validation, cross-chain settlement—each link can create new revenue points. This is not just a single mining profit but involves participating in the entire ecosystem's value circulation.
**Why This Wave Is Different**
The crypto market has experienced many node booms over the past few years, but most ultimately turned into "mining farm games"—competing over hardware, electricity costs, and scale. The final winners were those with industrial-grade infrastructure.
This time, the difference lies in significantly lowering the barriers to entry. Small and medium participants can leverage less capital to achieve relatively good returns. The protocols themselves are designed to avoid extreme centralization—through task decentralization, diversified rewards, and other mechanisms, ensuring a more balanced distribution of benefits among ecosystem participants.
**How Big Is the Current Node Market?**
According to some on-chain data, the total staked amount of major validation protocols' nodes has already surpassed several billion dollars. The number of active participating nodes is also growing by over 50% month-over-month. This indicates that the market is indeed reallocating resources.
What does this mean for ordinary investors? If you are optimistic about the development of Web3 infrastructure, participating in the node economy might be a more stable choice than pure secondary market trading. Of course, choosing which protocol to support and how to manage risks still requires research.
In summary, the node battle of 2025 has just begun. This competition is not about who has the most powerful graphics card but about who can participate more intelligently in the distribution of ecosystem value.