Dogecoin's issuance logic is often misunderstood. An annual fixed issuance of about 5 billion coins, with an additional 16 billion coins within the rules framework — this is the source of miner rewards.
Issuance itself is not the problem; supply-side pressure is a short-term reality. But in the long run, what truly determines price trends are two key factors:
First, whether demand can keep up. The expansion of payment scenarios like Tesla and X platform represents how close Dogecoin is to real-world applications. Second, the ecosystem and consensus. As long as the community and application ecosystem continue to grow, regular issuance cannot fundamentally shake the foundation.
Rather than fixating on the issuance numbers, it’s better to focus on its adoption progress in real business scenarios. That is the true reference for judging long-term value.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-83070f95
· 4h ago
For currency non-issuance, it is self-limiting; the annual loss or stagnation is far more than just the issue of new currency.
View OriginalReply0
DAOplomacy
· 5h ago
ngl the whole "inflation isn't real if adoption keeps pace" argument has some non-trivial game theoretical implications... but historically precedent suggests stakeholders get real comfortable with that narrative until they don't, ya know?
Reply0
ForumMiningMaster
· 5h ago
Honestly, the issue of issuance expansion has been demonized by everyone; it's basically just miners' earnings.
The core still depends on the application scenario. Does Tesla really need it?
50 billion a year sounds like a lot, but if someone is actually using it, it's not a big deal at all.
Instead of obsessing over the numbers, it's better to see what Doge has expanded in the payment sector this year.
For coins without real demand, issuing an extra one is pointless.
The key is whether the consensus still exists—that's the true moat.
View OriginalReply0
BlockImposter
· 5h ago
Instead of worrying about the issuance numbers, focus on its adoption progress in real business scenarios. That is the true reference for judging long-term value.
My comment:
That's right, if Elon Musk really starts using Dogecoin, then any issuance increase won't be an issue.
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandSister
· 5h ago
That's right. Instead of constantly watching the issuance data, it's better to see when Elon Musk will actually start using Dogecoin.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinGuardian
· 5h ago
That's right. Instead of constantly worrying about inflation data, it's better to see where the Dogecoin in your wallet can be used.
Dogecoin's issuance logic is often misunderstood. An annual fixed issuance of about 5 billion coins, with an additional 16 billion coins within the rules framework — this is the source of miner rewards.
Issuance itself is not the problem; supply-side pressure is a short-term reality. But in the long run, what truly determines price trends are two key factors:
First, whether demand can keep up. The expansion of payment scenarios like Tesla and X platform represents how close Dogecoin is to real-world applications. Second, the ecosystem and consensus. As long as the community and application ecosystem continue to grow, regular issuance cannot fundamentally shake the foundation.
Rather than fixating on the issuance numbers, it’s better to focus on its adoption progress in real business scenarios. That is the true reference for judging long-term value.