Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
A former Theranos fraud investigator has filed a lawsuit against multiple AI development companies—xAI, Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, Meta, and Perplexity—on Monday, claiming they trained their AI systems using copyrighted books without proper authorization. The case highlights growing legal tensions surrounding data usage in AI development. As artificial intelligence systems become more sophisticated and widely deployed, questions about intellectual property rights and fair use in machine learning training continue to escalate. The lawsuit suggests that obtaining proper licensing for training materials may become standard practice in the industry moving forward.
Wait, why is it Theranos's investigator coming out to complain? Is this guy trying to ride the hype?
Now it's settled, future training data will have to be paid for with real money, and model costs will rise again.
Honestly, this should have been regulated a long time ago; large models are consuming books excessively.
If copyright fees must be paid, the open-source community's days will be tough.
---
As expected, there are no free lunches in the world; data is no exception.
---
OpenAI's situation is a bit precarious; let's wait and see how the verdict unfolds.
---
Copyright issues will be settled sooner or later. Suing now shows awareness.
---
Old giants like Google and Meta still have to take a hit.
---
Instead of lawsuits, it's faster to just buy licenses.
---
This guy came from a scam company and is now targeting AI companies. Interesting.
---
Pay for training data? Then the cost of models will skyrocket in the future.
---
Waiting for the verdict to see if this can shake up the entire industry landscape.
---
It's called "fair use" in nice words, but basically it's freeloading. Now they've been caught.
Wait, he's suing six major companies at the same time? Where's the money for the lawyer fees coming from? Someone must be backing him up, 99% sure.
This copyright lawsuit was bound to happen sooner or later, OpenAI and others should have been targeted long ago, it's just a matter of who dares to be the first to take the plunge.
If this really leads to losses, the cost of AI training will skyrocket, which would be a death blow for small startups. The big companies can absorb it better...
Still active, this group of company lawyers has been waiting for this, the damages won't be that significant.
---
Oh my, are the big companies really going to spend money this time?
---
Wait, is he saying that all AI is trained on pirated books? That seems a bit exaggerated...
---
The folks at OpenAI must be having a headache, constantly facing lawsuits.
---
To be honest, if this case wins, the entire industry will have to be reshuffled, which is a bit exciting.
---
Here we go again. Every time there's news about AI, it's always about copyright. Isn't it annoying?
---
What about the models that have already been trained? Are they going to look back on that?
---
Why not directly sue ChatGPT? Why go after so many companies?
---
This guy is really just making money by telling people, right? Seems like he has some professional skills.
---
Now it's "licensing will become standard"... Let's wait and see, anyway, the big companies can't afford this.
---
Another ex-Theranos person coming out to ride the wave? Well, this time they actually hit the nail on the head.
---
So it turns out that big models are just freeloading off books... no wonder they’re so cheap.
---
The issue of licensing fees will have to be settled eventually, those models that are pouring money into training will have to make up for it later.
---
This trick is just like Theranos, it’ll all be settled in court... but data infringement really doesn’t have room for negotiation.
---
Wait, they really just took someone’s book to train on without signing a contract? How much will that cost?
---
Hey, isn’t this exactly what the big companies have been avoiding... finally, someone has fired the first shot.
---
The copyright holders must be thrilled to see this news, collective lawsuits could probably stir up quite a commotion.
Oh my God, these big companies are really going to face penalties this time, using people's books to train models without asking.
But then again, if they really need to get full authorization, the training costs would multiply several times, right? It feels like this will become a new industry pain point.
Interesting, the investigator from Theranos is coming to crash the party of AI companies. Who wrote this script?
I just want to know how much they will end up paying, this wave of suckers being played for suckers really has taste.