2025-12-20 13:07:16

Of course, there are potential risks/disputes: centralization of power to Labs? DAO efficiency issues?

1. Some community members believe this marks the failure of "gradual decentralization," with power becoming more concentrated in Labs (from DAO to corporate governance).

2. If not approved: UNI may face short-term pressure, continuing the narrative of "value capture deficiency."
3. More broadly: highlighting DAO efficiency issues, with other projects (such as Arbitrum, Optimism) also moving toward centralization.

Overall, this is a milestone for DeFi in 2025. If approved, it will directly improve UNI's fundamentals and encourage more protocols to consider "how tokens can truly capture protocol value." Voting is currently underway, and UNI holders are encouraged to actively participate in governance! #DeFi开发 #Uniswap #DappDevelopment

Question）

UNI0,51%

ARB1,27%

OP1,26%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.