Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I noticed Circle's move to acquire the Axelar development team, and I suddenly feel that the impact of this event might be even deeper than the FTX collapse back then.
Think about it, what was FTX? Naked fraud, blatant plunder. But Circle's approach is different—under the guise of compliance, using the power of capital to bring an independent protocol layer development team under its wing. On the surface, it seems completely legal, but what about the reality?
This reflects a harsh truth in the crypto world by 2025: the ecosystem is experiencing a "separation of spirit and flesh." On one side, compliant platforms expand their control over the underlying infrastructure through capital, while on the other side, the original ideals of protocol decentralization are gradually being eroded.
FTX is destruction; Circle is absorption. The former is destruction, the latter is transformation. From a certain perspective, the power of transformation can sometimes be more covert and thorough than destruction. This warrants vigilance across the entire ecosystem.
Thinking this way, everything becomes a conspiracy. I actually think that a capable team being recognized by capital shows that the project is indeed solid.
The most effective knife of transformation is the one that silently hollowed out decentralization... really.
However, speaking of which, which big company doesn't use this tactic when entering the market? As long as there's money, that's all that matters.
Circle's move is establishing a new centralized discourse power, essentially using money to smash decentralization. I really want to know how Axelar team's on-chain data is performing now—will they be sidelined?
Takeover vs. destruction, the former is truly encroachment. If this continues, the survival space for independent developers will become increasingly squeezed.
If I had known, I wouldn't have been so optimistic about the cross-chain sector; arbitrage opportunities have instead become reasons for being exploited.
Is this human logic self-consistent? Or are we all too pessimistic?
From another perspective, could this move actually accelerate the emergence of new chains? After all, more and more people are resentful of being taken over.
We need to build positions in small-cap tokens for defense; can't go all-in on projects that might be absorbed.