I proposed a target price of $100 on the first day of $FOLKS listing. Subsequently, the price retraced, and many people began to question this prediction. When the market rebounded, I mentioned this figure again, and some threw out various criticisms.
Today, I will present specific data to clarify why I remain optimistic about this project.
Let's start with the fundamentals: $FOLKS has a total supply of 50 million tokens, with only 12 million currently in circulation. At the current price of $5, the circulating market cap is only $60 million. Compared to tokens with a issuance of 1 billion or more, this is a much smaller scale.
Why did I call for $100 on the first day of listing? Precisely because at that time, the circulating supply was extremely limited, and the scarcity created a significant imagination space.
Now that the price has fallen, some people are saying this is a trash project destined to zero, with all kinds of pessimistic views emerging. But if you look at these two data points—total supply of 50 million and circulating supply of 12 million—you'll understand why there's no need to be overly pessimistic. The circulating supply itself is insufficient, and the total market cap isn't large, which inherently determines that its scarcity characteristics won't change.
Friends who are trapped don't need to panic too much. From a supply perspective, the structural advantage of this token has not been compromised.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SandwichTrader
· 2025-12-22 05:29
With such a small circulating supply, you still dare to say it will drop to zero; you haven't even figured out the logic.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiAnon
· 2025-12-21 04:30
I've heard the rhetoric about scarcity too many times, but the data is indeed there...
---
I saw it at 100 dollars too, and it was indeed a bit bold at that time, but with such a small circulation, it’s really quite interesting to be honest.
---
With the supply side advantages and structural factors... Can you just say straight if this thing will rebound?
---
A total of 50 million is indeed much more conscientious than those junk coins. If we really calculate based on scarcity, it’s not completely nonsense.
---
I understand the mentality of being trapped, but don’t let the 100 dollar statement blow up your mindset. You still have to stop loss if you need to.
---
A circulation of 12 million sounds low, but what if a large amount is unlocked later? How do you calculate that risk?
---
Wait, if you’re really that optimistic, why is the coin price actually dropping? It doesn’t quite add up.
---
As long as it doesn’t fall below the issue price, I’ll keep holding it, since I’m already here... Just betting on scarcity.
---
Seeing you talk about the data in such detail, it does have some substance, but I just don’t know how the actual fundamentals are.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGriller
· 2025-12-20 11:00
With so few floating chips, it really shows some imagination.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainArchaeologist
· 2025-12-20 04:15
Scarcity is truly a double-edged sword. Less circulation can indeed create speculative potential, but it also makes it easier to be dumped on.
View OriginalReply0
IronArmorBigTreasure
· 2025-12-19 08:58
I really laughed. Are you a dog whale or a supporter of a dog whale? Still $100? Get ready to be proven wrong.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSkeptic
· 2025-12-19 06:51
The scarcity aspect is indeed a highlight; a total supply of 50 million is really not that much.
View OriginalReply0
ForkYouPayMe
· 2025-12-19 06:47
Scarcity is indeed a key point; having a fixed circulation volume is an advantage.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgage
· 2025-12-19 06:30
The selling point is indeed good; it depends on whether the circulating supply can be maintained in the future.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 2025-12-19 06:29
Scarcity indeed exists, but whether it can truly rise depends on subsequent practical applications. Just talking about data is useless.
I proposed a target price of $100 on the first day of $FOLKS listing. Subsequently, the price retraced, and many people began to question this prediction. When the market rebounded, I mentioned this figure again, and some threw out various criticisms.
Today, I will present specific data to clarify why I remain optimistic about this project.
Let's start with the fundamentals: $FOLKS has a total supply of 50 million tokens, with only 12 million currently in circulation. At the current price of $5, the circulating market cap is only $60 million. Compared to tokens with a issuance of 1 billion or more, this is a much smaller scale.
Why did I call for $100 on the first day of listing? Precisely because at that time, the circulating supply was extremely limited, and the scarcity created a significant imagination space.
Now that the price has fallen, some people are saying this is a trash project destined to zero, with all kinds of pessimistic views emerging. But if you look at these two data points—total supply of 50 million and circulating supply of 12 million—you'll understand why there's no need to be overly pessimistic. The circulating supply itself is insufficient, and the total market cap isn't large, which inherently determines that its scarcity characteristics won't change.
Friends who are trapped don't need to panic too much. From a supply perspective, the structural advantage of this token has not been compromised.