Justice Network publishes an article titled "Establishing Multiple Judicial Disposal Paths for Criminal Cases Involving Virtual Currencies." The article points out that a gradual establishment of multiple judicial disposal paths for criminal cases involving virtual currencies should be implemented: introducing compliant third-party institutions into practice to assist with on-chain tracking, secure custody, and compliant liquidation, and preventing fund recirculation and market speculation through procedures such as fund closed-loop circulation, on-chain evidence preservation, and price evaluation. Meanwhile, it is recommended to clarify the legal positioning of third-party institutions, unify technical and procedural standards, and strengthen oversight by prosecutorial authorities throughout the entire process. Regarding disposal methods, the article suggests distinguishing between different modes such as liquidation, restitution, and destruction: prioritizing value recovery for cases requiring compensation for victims; for tokens used for illegal purposes with poor liquidity, lawful destruction or technical sequestration can be employed; for special cases like stablecoins, exploring the possibility of returning the original tokens under compliant conditions.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Justice Network publishes an article titled "Establishing Multiple Judicial Disposal Paths for Criminal Cases Involving Virtual Currencies." The article points out that a gradual establishment of multiple judicial disposal paths for criminal cases involving virtual currencies should be implemented: introducing compliant third-party institutions into practice to assist with on-chain tracking, secure custody, and compliant liquidation, and preventing fund recirculation and market speculation through procedures such as fund closed-loop circulation, on-chain evidence preservation, and price evaluation. Meanwhile, it is recommended to clarify the legal positioning of third-party institutions, unify technical and procedural standards, and strengthen oversight by prosecutorial authorities throughout the entire process. Regarding disposal methods, the article suggests distinguishing between different modes such as liquidation, restitution, and destruction: prioritizing value recovery for cases requiring compensation for victims; for tokens used for illegal purposes with poor liquidity, lawful destruction or technical sequestration can be employed; for special cases like stablecoins, exploring the possibility of returning the original tokens under compliant conditions.