2025-12-10 15:20:21

Most folks seriously underestimate what it takes to get a stablecoin listed on major exchange spot markets. The barriers? Way higher than people think.

Only a handful of stablecoins have actually made it through. Why? Because approval isn't just about technical specs or market cap. Compliance frameworks, regulatory alignment, reserve transparency, audit requirements—the checklist is brutal.

Yet everyone acts like launching a stablecoin and getting spot listing is some casual Tuesday task. It's not. The gatekeeping exists for a reason, and it's tougher than most projects care to admit.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PretendingSerious

· 2025-12-13 15:17

Haha, really, too many people think that issuing a stablecoin is as simple as launching a token, and they completely ignore the importance of compliance. Oh my, regulatory hurdles have discouraged 99% of projects, yet some are still daydreaming. I mean, not all coins are worthy of being listed on top-tier exchanges; the threshold is there, not just for decoration. It's hilarious—many small projects treat spot listing as a game, not realizing that what they really need is full compliance plus transparent reserves, not just technical indicators. Honestly, only a few stablecoins can truly pass this hurdle; most fall at the compliance framework stage.

View OriginalReply0

RadioShackKnight

· 2025-12-11 00:51

A bunch of project teams hype it up, but end up stuck at compliance and can't move. LOL

View OriginalReply0

TerraNeverForget

· 2025-12-10 15:48

Really, so many project teams boast about getting listed on exchanges as if it's as easy as eating, wake up everyone Stablecoins are not that easy to get through; compliance and audits have knocked out quite a few Another bunch of teams think that being technically skilled is enough to pass the review, only to find out they still have to deal with regulators, hilarious Just look at those projects that failed, having money isn't enough; transparency in reserves is the easiest to expose

View OriginalReply0

SlowLearnerWang

· 2025-12-10 15:43

Sigh, another project team gets face-slapped... Thinking stablecoins are so easy to make Now I finally understand, it's not a technical issue, but the regulatory hurdle that can't be cleared This list is just ridiculous, compliance frameworks, audits... so troublesome To be honest, I used to think it was just listing on an exchange, but seeing this now, I really was naive It's always the same, only regret after the official announcement when I realize I didn't understand enough...

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlord

· 2025-12-10 15:39

Haha, you're right. Those anxious entrepreneurs really think that issuing stablecoins is as easy as launching a token — naive. Compliance is the real bloodbath. Not all coins will make it to the day they go live on the spot market.

View OriginalReply0