2025-12-10 11:35:18

After this round of operations, I wonder how many people have started reconsidering their ecosystem choices?

To be honest, the community now needs a channel for voice. Why not do an on-chain vote? Let everyone express their stance—continue staying in BSC, or simply return to the SOL ecosystem?

After all, those holding positions have the most say. Instead of guessing and guessing, it's better to listen directly to real opinions. The choice of chain is not a small matter; community opinions need to be brought to the table for discussion.

SOL1,95%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkTrooper

· 2025-12-11 18:19

Haha, on-chain voting sounds good, but will anyone really change it? I'm just going to relax anyway.

View OriginalReply0

SingleForYears

· 2025-12-11 03:40

Anyway, I don't think this kind of voting is reliable; in the end, it's still the big players who decide.

View OriginalReply0

InscriptionGriller

· 2025-12-10 12:05

On-chain voting? Ha, here we go again. Telling me that retail investors have no say. At critical moments, I've never seen a real vote actually make a difference.

View OriginalReply0

ForkItAll

· 2025-12-10 12:04

Really, this round of actions has almost dispersed people's trust. On-chain voting sounds good, but the problem is... who dares to move the results once they are truly revealed?

View OriginalReply0

TokenStorm

· 2025-12-10 12:02

On-chain voting is a good idea, but do you really think whales will follow public opinion? Data from the past few community votes show that large holders' holdings have exceeded 73%, and their voting power has long been decided. Still, I will vote anyway, as I'm just idling anyway [dog head]

View OriginalReply0

ThesisInvestor