2025-12-10 11:28:34

Some regulatory moves just don't add up. Take this recent policy targeting teen social media use—it's built on shaky foundations. The data? Questionable at best. The reasoning? Even worse. When you're restricting access for an entire generation based on flawed evidence and half-baked logic, you're not solving problems—you're creating new ones. Policy should follow facts, not the other way around.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ZenZKPlayer

· 2025-12-13 10:53

ngl Can you trust this data? Feels like the same old story again...

View OriginalReply0

HypotheticalLiquidator

· 2025-12-11 05:55

Making cuts to requirements before fully understanding the data; this wave of health factors clearly doesn't meet the standards.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 2025-12-10 19:04

NGL, this policy is ridiculous. The data doesn't hold up, and they still want to control teen social interactions... Basically, it's a knee-jerk decision.

View OriginalReply0

TommyTeacher1

· 2025-12-10 11:45

Another "For your own good" policy joke, the data is all made up 😮‍💨

View OriginalReply0

YieldFarmRefugee

· 2025-12-10 11:40

ngl, this data really can't stand scrutiny. Is controlling teenagers' internet use based on such lousy logic? LOL

View OriginalReply0

AirdropGrandpa

· 2025-12-10 11:37

ngl, these regulatory agencies are really just messing around. Limiting an entire generation's usage rights without solid proof? 🤔 The logic is terrible.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyMiner

· 2025-12-10 11:32

Here we go again, banning this and that? The data isn't solid, and yet you still want to block an entire generation's access.

View OriginalReply0