After three years in the crypto circle, what outrageous script have you never seen?
There is a buddy with a principal of 30,000 US dollars, half a month to 300,000 yuan, and then his brain is full of studs, and the account balance is in three digits seven days later. There are also people who are slow to do swing and only earn 50 points a year, but they have not lost a single point of principal for three consecutive years.
In this industry, it is never who is bold. To survive to the end, there are only two things - the position can be controlled and the trend can be judged. This is a hundred times more useful than staring at those so-called "first-hand news".
**Let's talk about the position first. **
Some time ago, I met a friend, and 68,000 US dollars directly rushed to a popular coin, but as a result, there was a 15% correction, and more than 10,000 dollars evaporated in an instant. At that time, the whole person's mentality was cracked, and they were clamoring in the group to cut the meat.
I advised him not to be impulsive and showed him the routine I had explored in three years - **Five life-saving position sharing method**:
• The total capital is cut into 5 pieces, and only one move is carried out each time • Each order has a safety line, and the total capital loss is up to 2% (the stop loss per coin is controlled at 10%-12%) • The take-profit target is at least 50%, and the profit-loss ratio starts at 5:1
In human words: eat a lot of meat when you make money, and only lose some scum when you lose.
He later laid out ZEC according to this method, and the first three orders were two losses and one profit, which was not eye-catching. As a result, when the accounts were finally settled, the net profit was 33%, not only filling in the previous losses, but also making a profit.
You see, the crypto market is not about "winning fast", but about "affording to lose". Even if ten orders lose five orders, as long as the five orders that make money are ruthless enough, they can still have the last laugh.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeAssassin
· 2025-12-13 02:31
It really is true, those fully invested have become the little guys, and only the surviving ones are the frugal boys.
View OriginalReply0
LoneValidator
· 2025-12-13 01:15
That's right, from 30,000 to 300,000 to three digits... I've seen too many of these, and the moment dreams of overnight wealth shatter is truly heartbreaking.
By the way, the five-part position set is indeed reliable, much more honest than those scammers who keep touting "hundredfold coins."
View OriginalReply0
orphaned_block
· 2025-12-10 04:03
Really, the full warehouse stud set has long been eliminated and will not survive a bear market.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiEscapeArtist
· 2025-12-10 03:49
Really, I've seen several of the guys in Mancang Stud, and they have the same ending every time
Mentality management is really more valuable than any technical aspect, and it is so true
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 2025-12-10 03:44
According to the data, the core logic of the five-life-saving split method, the setting of the profit-loss ratio of 5:1, is actually benchmarked against the risk-adjusted optimal allocation in the Kelly formula. From the analysis of on-chain trading behavior, the three-year survival rate of accounts that can adhere to this set of discipline is significantly higher than that of the radical full position, which reflects the trade-off between the compound growth curve and the risk of single bankruptcy. It is worth noting that the 33% return of ZEC in this article is still lower than BTC's performance in the same period on an annualized basis, but its win rate and drawdown control data are more informative - which may be more in line with the practice of modern portfolio theory than the strategy of chasing high multiples returns.
View OriginalReply0
memecoin_therapy
· 2025-12-10 03:38
That's right, but there are few who can really persist, and mentality is more difficult than anything else.
After three years in the crypto circle, what outrageous script have you never seen?
There is a buddy with a principal of 30,000 US dollars, half a month to 300,000 yuan, and then his brain is full of studs, and the account balance is in three digits seven days later. There are also people who are slow to do swing and only earn 50 points a year, but they have not lost a single point of principal for three consecutive years.
In this industry, it is never who is bold. To survive to the end, there are only two things - the position can be controlled and the trend can be judged. This is a hundred times more useful than staring at those so-called "first-hand news".
**Let's talk about the position first. **
Some time ago, I met a friend, and 68,000 US dollars directly rushed to a popular coin, but as a result, there was a 15% correction, and more than 10,000 dollars evaporated in an instant. At that time, the whole person's mentality was cracked, and they were clamoring in the group to cut the meat.
I advised him not to be impulsive and showed him the routine I had explored in three years - **Five life-saving position sharing method**:
• The total capital is cut into 5 pieces, and only one move is carried out each time
• Each order has a safety line, and the total capital loss is up to 2% (the stop loss per coin is controlled at 10%-12%)
• The take-profit target is at least 50%, and the profit-loss ratio starts at 5:1
In human words: eat a lot of meat when you make money, and only lose some scum when you lose.
He later laid out ZEC according to this method, and the first three orders were two losses and one profit, which was not eye-catching. As a result, when the accounts were finally settled, the net profit was 33%, not only filling in the previous losses, but also making a profit.
You see, the crypto market is not about "winning fast", but about "affording to lose". Even if ten orders lose five orders, as long as the five orders that make money are ruthless enough, they can still have the last laugh.