Breaking: ORE's minting mechanism just hit the brakes. The program's now frozen with a hard cap at 3 million tokens—that's a massive 40% cut from the original maximum supply projections.
What does this mean? Scarcity just intensified. With fewer tokens able to enter circulation and the deflationary design still intact, basic economics suggests upward pressure on valuation. Supply shock meets constant (or growing) demand—you do the math.
The team's maintaining the burn mechanisms while permanently limiting new issuance. For holders, this supply constraint could translate into strengthened tokenomics fundamentals. Whether price action follows theory remains to be seen, but the structural setup just got tighter.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NotGonnaMakeIt
· 2025-12-10 02:43
40% supply cut? The coin is about to take off, right?
View OriginalReply0
RegenRestorer
· 2025-12-10 00:03
40% of the supply cut? Now we’ll have to see if ORE can really hold up.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_trauma
· 2025-12-09 23:56
Really? They just cut 40% directly? Now it's not even about betting on the tokenomics anymore, it's purely a gamble on whether the team can wrap up the story well.
View OriginalReply0
FudVaccinator
· 2025-12-09 23:49
40% supply cut? Haha, that's hilarious. Now we’ll see if the team is actually taking action or just making empty promises again.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 2025-12-09 23:47
40% supply cut? Well, here we go again with the same old "deflationary bailout" trick.
Breaking: ORE's minting mechanism just hit the brakes. The program's now frozen with a hard cap at 3 million tokens—that's a massive 40% cut from the original maximum supply projections.
What does this mean? Scarcity just intensified. With fewer tokens able to enter circulation and the deflationary design still intact, basic economics suggests upward pressure on valuation. Supply shock meets constant (or growing) demand—you do the math.
The team's maintaining the burn mechanisms while permanently limiting new issuance. For holders, this supply constraint could translate into strengthened tokenomics fundamentals. Whether price action follows theory remains to be seen, but the structural setup just got tighter.