Someone's making a bold pitch to the President: prediction markets are supposedly the next big thing after AI—so critical that foreign platforms interfering with market sentiment could threaten the entire economy. Their solution? Ban Kalshi outright.
This raises questions though. Are prediction markets really that influential? Or is this just regulatory theater? The debate around platforms like Kalshi shows how seriously some policymakers are taking on-chain prediction protocols. Whether it's overreach or genuine concern, the rhetoric is heating up fast.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ApeShotFirst
· 2025-12-12 15:28
Haha, coming back to deceive us again by saying the prediction market can crash the economy, it's really outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueen
· 2025-12-10 22:24
Uh... another phrase about the "economic lifeblood." I've seen this rhetoric too many times in smart contract vulnerability analysis. Have regulatory authorities really understood the attack vectors of prediction markets?
View OriginalReply0
MainnetDelayedAgain
· 2025-12-09 23:03
According to the database, it has been 2 years and 8 months since the last similar rhetoric about "prediction markets threatening the national economy." The hype index of the project's promises is steadily rising. It is recommended to be included in the Guinness World Records.
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprived
· 2025-12-09 22:58
Here we go again? Banning Kalshi will save the economy? What a joke, the regulators are making up stories again.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrant
· 2025-12-09 22:49
Here comes another regulatory drama. Do they really consider prediction markets the lifeblood of the economy? Hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiChallenger
· 2025-12-09 22:43
It's that time of year again for the annual "this time it will really change the world" theater. Ironically, data shows that the actual trading volume of US prediction markets accounts for less than 0.3% of the total crypto market cap—how could that possibly threaten the economy? Interestingly, during the 2008 financial crisis, no one called for a ban on the derivatives market. But now, it's the small-scale prediction markets that have become a "national security issue."
Someone's making a bold pitch to the President: prediction markets are supposedly the next big thing after AI—so critical that foreign platforms interfering with market sentiment could threaten the entire economy. Their solution? Ban Kalshi outright.
This raises questions though. Are prediction markets really that influential? Or is this just regulatory theater? The debate around platforms like Kalshi shows how seriously some policymakers are taking on-chain prediction protocols. Whether it's overreach or genuine concern, the rhetoric is heating up fast.